Quick Ratios
Quarterly Results
Profit & Loss
Balance Sheet
Cash Flow
Ratios
Mkt Cap
Market Capitalization
₹140Cr
Rev Gr TTM
Revenue Growth TTM
-21.45%
Peer Comparison
Compare up to 10 companies side by side across valuation, profitability, and growth.

APOLLOFI
VS
| Quarter | Mar 2023 | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 |
|---|
|
Growth YoY Revenue Growth YoY% | -61.0 | -70.1 | -70.8 | -48.0 | -1.1 | 61.9 | 83.9 | 68.5 | 15.6 | -29.6 | -27.7 | -41.1 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Operating Profit Operating ProfitCr |
| 36.2 | 62.6 | 69.6 | 57.0 | 18.3 | 48.0 | 54.2 | 38.5 | 29.1 | 38.6 | 66.2 | 75.8 |
Other Income Other IncomeCr | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Interest Expense Interest ExpenseCr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Depreciation DepreciationCr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Growth YoY PAT Growth YoY% | -63.2 | 32.9 | -38.4 | 1.2 | -67.2 | -15.8 | 23.0 | -43.8 | 36.8 | -1.7 | -27.8 | 29.8 |
| 33.0 | 61.0 | 50.9 | 54.5 | 10.9 | 31.8 | 34.0 | 18.1 | 13.0 | 44.3 | 34.0 | 40.0 |
| 6.2 | 7.5 | 5.2 | 6.7 | 2.0 | 6.3 | 6.5 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 6.2 | 4.7 | 4.9 |
| Financial Year | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | TTM |
|---|
|
| 97.7 | -47.1 | -37.1 | 61.2 | 100.9 | 693.1 | -46.3 | 362.3 | -36.7 | -55.0 | 51.6 | -24.2 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 10 | 57 | 31 | 11 | 18 | 12 |
Operating Profit Operating ProfitCr |
| 69.9 | 47.7 | -14.9 | 60.1 | 54.9 | 35.5 | 33.5 | 19.1 | 30.4 | 47.3 | 42.0 | 48.8 |
Other Income Other IncomeCr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Interest Expense Interest ExpenseCr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Depreciation DepreciationCr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 17 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
|
| 121.2 | -51.0 | -86.8 | 856.4 | 38.7 | 341.2 | -38.3 | 210.4 | -20.8 | -20.5 | -9.9 | -4.1 |
| 53.2 | 49.2 | 10.3 | 61.2 | 42.3 | 23.5 | 27.0 | 18.1 | 22.7 | 40.1 | 23.8 | 30.2 |
| 4.7 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 17.8 | 11.0 | 34.1 | 27.0 | 21.5 | 19.3 | 18.4 |
| Financial Year | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Sep 2025 |
|---|
Equity Capital Equity CapitalCr | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| 11 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 15 | 21 | 25 | 38 | 48 | 56 | 64 | 68 |
Current Liabilities Current LiabilitiesCr | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 7 | 30 | 10 | 7 | 10 | |
Non Current Liabilities Non Current LiabilitiesCr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 31 | 24 | 36 | 11 | 6 | 30 | |
Total Liabilities Total LiabilitiesCr |
Current Assets Current AssetsCr | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 11 | 10 | |
Non Current Assets Non Current AssetsCr | 15 | 14 | 15 | 12 | 28 | 63 | 55 | 101 | 70 | 62 | 97 | |
Total Assets Total AssetsCr |
| Financial Year | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|
Operating Cash Flow Operating Cash FlowCr | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | -2 | 26 | 6 | -12 | 24 | -36 | -25 |
Investing Cash Flow Investing Cash FlowCr | 0 | -1 | -1 | 4 | -4 | -23 | 0 | 1 | -16 | 42 | 2 |
Financing Cash Flow Financing Cash FlowCr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | -2 | -4 | 10 | -10 | 0 | 25 |
|
Free Cash Flow Free Cash FlowCr | -1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | -9 | 26 | 6 | -12 | 24 | -34 | -27 |
| 1.9 | 50.6 | 457.1 | -160.1 | -160.1 | 393.1 | 152.6 | -90.7 | 239.9 | -447.8 | -352.2 |
CFO To EBITDA CFO To EBITDA% | 1.5 | 52.3 | -316.8 | -163.1 | -123.4 | 260.7 | 123.3 | -85.9 | 179.0 | -379.8 | -199.8 |
| Financial Year | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|
Valuation Ratios Valuation Ratios |
Market Cap Market CapitalizationCr | 4 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 24 | 119 | 123 | 298 | 211 | 362 | 228 |
Price To Earnings Price To Earnings | 2.5 | 4.5 | 47.7 | 9.3 | 15.6 | 17.9 | 29.9 | 23.4 | 21.0 | 45.2 | 31.6 |
Price To Sales Price To Sales | 1.4 | 2.2 | 4.8 | 5.7 | 6.6 | 4.2 | 8.1 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 18.1 | 7.5 |
Price To Book Price To Book | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 7.1 | 4.1 | 6.0 | 3.4 |
| 1.8 | 4.4 | -31.8 | 7.2 | 17.0 | 15.2 | 28.2 | 25.4 | 16.4 | 38.4 | 19.7 |
Profitability Ratios Profitability Ratios |
| 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| 69.9 | 47.7 | -14.9 | 60.1 | 54.9 | 35.5 | 33.5 | 19.1 | 30.4 | 47.3 | 42.0 |
| 53.2 | 49.2 | 10.3 | 61.2 | 42.3 | 23.5 | 27.0 | 18.1 | 22.7 | 40.1 | 23.8 |
| 16.0 | 6.7 | -0.6 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 17.3 | 10.5 | 19.4 | 23.6 | 15.7 | 12.3 |
| 12.1 | 5.6 | 0.7 | 6.5 | 8.2 | 26.5 | 14.1 | 30.4 | 19.4 | 13.3 | 10.7 |
| 10.7 | 5.5 | 0.7 | 6.4 | 5.1 | 10.1 | 6.8 | 11.8 | 13.7 | 11.0 | 6.7 |
Operational Ratios Operational Ratios |
Solvency Ratios Solvency Ratios |
Liquidity Ratios Liquidity Ratios |
### **Overview**
**Apollo Finvest (India) Limited**, established in 1985 and reinvigorated in 2015, is a publicly listed, non-deposit-taking **Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC)** that has evolved into a tech-first, infrastructure-led fintech platform. Headquartered in India and led by **Managing Director & CEO Mikhil Innani** and **CFO Diksha Nangia**, the company operates as a **B2B2C digital lending enabler**, positioning itself as the “**AWS of Digital Lending**.”
With a foundational mission of **financial inclusion**, Apollo leverages technology, capital, and regulatory strength to empower fintechs, e-commerce platforms, and digital lenders—without competing for end customers. It enables these partners to launch secure, scalable, and compliant digital lending services **within 48 hours**.
---
### **Core Business Model & Strategy**
#### **Strategic Clarity and Phased Growth**
Apollo’s strategy centers on **strategic clarity**, **risk discipline**, and **long-term sustainable scaling**:
- **Phase 1**: Building distribution via **short-term term loans (4–12 months)** with reputable, compliant NBFCs.
- **Phase 2**: Expanding into **co-lending**, **Business Correspondent (BC) partnerships**, and **embedded lending** with top-tier digital lenders, including NBFCs and Lending Service Providers (LSPs).
The company avoids marketplace models and prioritizes **exclusive, high-conviction partnerships** with firms that have “skin in the game” through shared risk and capital commitment.
#### **Indirect, Platform-First Lending Approach**
Apollo does **not lend directly** to end borrowers. Instead:
- It operates through a **curated network** of high-performing fintech and NBFC partners.
- Each partner acts as a **satellite branch**, enabling Apollo to scale as a **branchless, tech-driven lender** with embedded distribution on smartphones.
Apollo’s platform is neutral and non-competitive—ensuring trust by **never onboarding customers directly** from partners, thus aligning incentives.
---
### **Technology & Innovation**
Apollo’s competitive advantage lies in its **proprietary, AI-powered technology stack**, which enables **zero-marginal-cost scaling** and **near-instant loan processing**.
#### Key Tech Enablers:
- **Sonic**: A modular, plug-and-play **Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) Loan Management System (LMS)**, built in-house to replace outdated, inflexible legacy systems. It supports:
- Full digital loan lifecycle management
- Customizable underwriting workflows
- Real-time repayment tracking via webhooks
- Integration with payment gateways (Razorpay, Cashfree, etc.)
- Automated reconciliation, reducing finance workload by **90%**
- **Pincode Detective**: A geospatial analytics tool that assesses **risk at the postal code level**, optimizing regional lending based on default rates, volume, and repayment behavior.
- **Super Sonic**: An AI-driven **credit risk algorithm** trained on **over 1.6 million loan records** across 7–8 years. It enables Apollo to:
- Dynamically adjust risk profiles monthly
- Underwrite “false negatives” (previously rejected borrowers)
- Achieve superior risk-adjusted returns
- **Senti**: An **AI-powered voice sentiment analysis engine** trained on **500,000+ call recordings** across multiple Indian languages and dialects. Senti:
- Monitors **100% of collections calls** in real time
- Reduces manual call reviews by **90%**
- Flags borrower dissatisfaction and compliance issues
- Is now used by partners to improve service quality
- **AI-Generated Development**: Approximately **55% of Apollo’s code is AI-generated**, accelerating product development with an **ultra-lean team of 30–35 employees**.
---
### **Lending & Risk Management Framework**
#### **Capital Deployment & Portfolio Strategy**
- Apollo focuses on **term loans** to establish credit exposure and conduct deep due diligence before scaling co-lending.
- It maintains a **sub-12% blended cost of capital** and achieves **16–18% XIRR** on term loans.
- Capital is allocated via **committed lines (12–24 months)**, ensuring stability and predictable returns.
#### **Disciplined Partner Selection**
Apollo follows a **highly selective process** when onboarding partners:
- On-site evaluations of operations, data integrity, and founder involvement
- Preference for **A-player partners** with strong unit economics, profitability, and hands-on leadership
- Avoids entities with rapid debt-funded AUM growth without equity support or profitability
It evaluates **over 27 NBFCs**, using proprietary benchmarks to assess resilience and portfolio quality.
#### **Risk-Centric Underwriting**
- Only the **top 10–20%** of a partner’s loan book is selected for funding
- Uses a **proprietary classification model** trained on:
- Internal historical data
- Partner portfolio data
- Real-time repayment trends
- Emphasizes **sustainable unit economics**, **ROE**, and **portfolio quality** over volume
Apollo maintains a **gross NPA of 0.4%**, placing it in the **top 5% of the industry**, even as AUM scales.
#### **Collections & Recovery**
- Employs a **multi-layered, tech-led collections stack**:
- AI dashboards
- WhatsApp bots
- IVR systems
- Telecallers
- Specialized agencies
- Implements **End-of-Day Inflows (EDI)** for MSMEs, aligning repayments with cash flow—achieving **96% collection efficiency** vs. 75% for traditional EMIs.
---
### **Growth Trajectory & Financial Performance**
- **AUM growth**: Up **75% YoY**, with a strategic shift from LSPs to digital NBFCs post-RBI regulatory clarity.
- **Disbursements**: Jumped **5x in H2 2024** over H1, driven by higher-quality partners and the co-lending model.
- **ROE**: **Double-digit ROE sustained for 7–8 years**, attributed to disciplined risk management and focus.
- **Revenue model**: Dual streams from:
- **API usage fees**
- **Capital deployment returns (17–18% XIRR)**
Apollo expects to **exhaust internal equity capital** soon and is preparing for **debt financing** via banks and family offices, while maintaining a **debt-to-equity ratio below 2x**.
---
### **Regulatory & Market Positioning**
- Fully compliant with **RBI Digital Lending Guidelines (DLG)**.
- Shifted from commission-based LSP models to **co-lending** post-regulatory changes, improving compliance and transparency.
- Recognized as a **trusted, regulated NBFC** in a maturing digital lending ecosystem.
Apollo anticipates that over the next **4–5 years, major digital platforms will need their own NBFC licenses**, reinforcing the value of its **infrastructure-as-a-service** model.
---
### **Team & Culture**
- **Lean team of ~30**, with deep expertise in **risk, data science, credit analysis, and technology**.
- Actively hiring **data scientists and credit-risk strategists** to enhance underwriting.
- Management emphasizes **speed, precision, and long-term thinking**—over rapid scaling.
---
### **Differentiators & Flywheel Effect**
Apollo’s competitive moat is built on a **compounding flywheel**:
> **Each loan → enriches data → improves underwriting → attracts better partners → increases AUM → enhances technology → lowers cost basis → improves ROE**
This **self-reinforcing loop** enables sustainable, profitable growth—unlike many early "fast movers" (e.g., ZestMoney, LendingKart) that failed due to poor unit economics.
---
### **Key Financial & Operational Metrics (as of Aug 2025)**
| Metric | Value |
|-------|-------|
| AUM Growth (YoY) | ~75% |
| ROE | Double-digit (7–8 years consistent) |
| Gross NPA | 0.4% |
| Cost of Capital (blended) | <12% |
| XIRR from Term Loans | 16–18%+ |
| Loan Processing Cost | ~₹0 (near-zero) |
| Employees | 30 |
| Partnerships | Top 10–15 digital lenders |
| Loan Book Focus | Unsecured digital loans < ₹2 lakh |
| AUM Target Mix | 70% retail, 30% wholesale |