Aztec Fluids & Machinery Ltd Forensic Report - SOIC x StockScans Report

as of Sep 2026

Aztec Fluids' record carries a clean audit history, but the acquisition of a promoter-linked subsidiary that became an NPA within 15 months, and the opaque governance around related-party approvals, are the two things a reader should understand. The company's own auditors have flagged the subsidiary loan's missing repayment terms for two straight years, and shareholder votes on promoter deals pass with almost no public participation.

Key findings

  1. A ₹17 crore acquisition became an ICICI-designated NPA within 15 months Critical - Aztec bought Jet Inks for ₹17 crore on 31 May 2024, a related-party deal where it already held 18%. ICICI Bank classified Jet Inks as a Non-Performing Asset on 1 August 2025. The parent is exposed through ₹8.25 crore of subsidiary debt sitting outside standalone borrowings and a fresh ₹7.65 crore corporate guarantee approved on 4 Feb 2026, while the CFO says Jet Inks is behind on interest.
  2. The loan to Jet Inks has no repayment terms, and RPT votes pass on near-zero public float Major - CARO reports the loan to the wholly owned subsidiary has no formal schedule or agreement specifying repayment terms in both FY2025-26 and FY2024-25. Shareholder approvals for material related-party transactions with Jet Inks, Fluidtech Corp, and Axis Druckfarben each passed with only 2,000-4,000 shares voting in favour, while 7 members cast 10,000,000 invalid votes.
  3. Bank-filed current-asset statements disagree with the books for two years, while the notes call the differences minor Major - CARO clause ii(b) reported in FY2026 and FY2025 that quarterly returns filed with banks against working capital limits were "NOT in agreement with books of account". The company's own notes state the same statements are "generally in agreement" except for "some minor differences which are not material to report". The auditor issued unqualified opinions in all three years and communicated no Key Audit Matters in FY2026 or FY2025.
  4. Promoter family consolidates control through purchases, ESOPs, and pay proposals Major - Promoter shareholding stood at 74.76% as of FY2025-26, with zero pledge. The promoter couple made five open-market purchases between 3 Jun 2025 and 24 Mar 2026, adding roughly 0.76% combined. The AGM notice proposes ₹7 crore of managerial remuneration and ₹30 lakh p.a. of rent to the promoter couple, while the NRC approved ESOP grants at ₹15 per option (face value ₹10 plus ₹5 premium).
  5. Goodwill on the Jet Inks deal began amortizing only in FY26, with no impairment despite the NPA Major - The ₹17 crore acquisition created ₹2.6 crore of goodwill, which the company began amortizing over 15 years at 18.1% per annum only in FY2025-26. No impairment was identified as at the FY2025-26 year end. The prior year's policy said amortization would be driven by "changes in management, evolving market dynamics", assumptions unchanged despite the subsidiary's NPA status.
  6. Operating cash flow improved, but capital allocation stays opaque Minor - Standalone CFO rose to ₹8.54 crore against PAT of ₹7.41 crore in FY26 (1.15x), from 0.77x in FY25. But CWIP of ₹6.32 crore is 82% of gross PP&E, and the CFO disclosed ₹9.3 crore of investments without a capitalised-vs-expensed split. The CFO said the absolute CAPEX figure was "still under consideration at the board level" despite vendors and scope being finalised.
  7. Revenue recognition embeds bargain-settlement and hedged-contract gains, with receivables at 103 days Minor - Revenue from bargain settlement of goods and gains on hedged contracts are netted within revenue, per the FY2024-25 consolidated statements. Receivable days held at 103 in both FY26 and FY25, with receivables of ₹27.33 crore against revenue of ₹96.53 crore. The CFO attributed the 9.2% top-line growth to a "combination" of factors, citing a "very heavy slowdown" in extrusion due to the Middle East conflict.
  8. Depreciation and write-offs rose 85% with no breakdown, under the older AS regime Minor - Management says FY2025-26 PAT was "impacted significantly by higher depreciation charges and write-offs, which increased by 85% year-on-year," but provided no breakdown or quantification. The company reports under Accounting Standards (AS), not Ind AS. The CFO also cited lower other income as impacting profit growth, without quantifying it.

What to watch

Bottom line: This is an audited record with unqualified opinions and improving cash conversion, but the risk is concentrated in a single related-party structure. A ₹17 crore acquisition became an NPA within 15 months, leaving the parent exposed through off-balance-sheet debt and a fresh guarantee, while the loan's missing repayment terms and the contradictory bank-statement disclosures are recurring, not one-off. Watch the AGM votes and the FY2026-27 annual report for whether governance tightens or the patterns continue.