Cityon Systems (India) Ltd Forensic Report - SOIC x StockScans Report

as of Aug 2026

Cityon Systems' record carries seven straight unqualified audit opinions, but the clean opinions sit alongside a promoter's SEBI penalty unpaid for six years, a ₹24.69 crore tax demand carried as a contingent liability for five, and an internal audit system that its own filings say vanished in FY2024 and FY2026.

Key findings

  1. Promoter's ₹2 lakh SEBI penalty unpaid for six years, with attachment notices outstanding Major - SEBI imposed a ₹2,00,000 penalty on promoter Mr. Sanjay Kumar on 27.02.2020 and issued a Notice of Attachment of his bank and demat accounts. The secretarial auditor has flagged the matter as "still pending for action" in every report from FY2020-21 through FY2025-26, the sixth consecutive year. The FY2025-26 Annual Report still claims no significant regulatory orders impact going concern.
  2. ₹24.69 crore income-tax demand carried as unprovided contingent liability for five years Major - An Income Tax demand of ₹24,69,01,615 for A.Y. 2010-11 to A.Y. 2016-17 has been treated as a contingent liability not provided for in books, with an appeal before the First Appellant Authority. A CIT(A) order dated 16.12.2024 restored all assessment orders to the assessing officer for fresh examination. The FY2021-22 auditor's report stated there were "no pending litigations impacting financial position" while the same report's CARO clause disclosed disputed income-tax dues with no amounts or forums.
  3. Seven years of clean audit opinions, but filings show no internal audit system in FY2024 and FY2026 Major - The company received unqualified opinions for FY2020 through FY2026 with no Emphasis of Matter or Key Audit Matters in any year. The FY2025-26 and FY2023-24 auditor's reports state "The Company has no internal audit system commensurate with size and nature of its business," while FY2021-22 and FY2022-23 reports say it "does have" one. The disputed statutory dues table under CARO clause vii(b) is populated with amounts, periods, and forums for FY2020-21 through FY2025-26.
  4. Filings name promoter-family entities as trade payables and receivables while all reports claim arm's length Major - FY2022-23 trade payables included CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD. ₹69,55,719, SHASHWAT AGARWAL ₹1,29,47,375, and SUDHIR AGARWAL ₹66,99,850, while trade receivables included BANSAL SUPPLIERS ₹93,00,483.80. The notes state "No interest charged on amounts recoverable from parties". Every Board's Report from FY2021-22 through FY2025-26 asserts all related-party transactions were at arm's length and in the ordinary course of business.
  5. Statutory auditor replaced mid-term for the second time in two years Major - Rajani Mukesh & Associates resigned on 22.08.2023 citing poor health, less than a year after being re-appointed for a five-year term at the 18th AGM on 21st Sep 2022. Srivastava S & Co. was appointed to fill the casual vacancy for five years from the 19th AGM (FY2023-24). The FY2022-23 financial statements were signed by the resigning auditor on 27.05.2023, roughly three months before the resignation.
  6. Revenue collapsed to near-zero, with the only disclosed stream being income on non-performing assets Major - Revenue from operations fell from ₹99,840.98 thousand in FY22 to ₹25,868.71 thousand in FY23 for Sale of Products/Traded Goods, and Sales of Shares fell from ₹99,944.05 thousand to ₹850.70 thousand. Reported revenue was ₹0.00 in FY26, ₹0.08 in FY25, and ₹0.00 in FY24 (in ₹ crore). The company's significant accounting policy states income on non-performing assets is "accounted in year of realization".
  7. Promoter faces unresolved SEBI penalty while board remuneration stays static, all resolutions pass unanimously Minor - The SEBI penalty and attachment notices against Mr. Sanjay Kumar remain "still pending for action" as of FY2025-26. Managing Director Mr. Mukesh Kumar was re-appointed for 5 years effective 31 July 2024 at salary ₹20,000 per month, with no sitting fee for board meetings. Every shareholder resolution from FY2020-21 through FY2025-26 passed with 100% in favour and 0% against.
  8. Zero depreciation in FY2022-23 and FY2021-22, with no deferred tax assets recognized Minor - Gross depreciation was NIL in FY2022-23 and FY2021-22. The company states "Previous year's figures have been reworked, regrouped and reclassified wherever necessary" in FY2025-26 and prior years. Deferred tax assets are not recognized per the company's "conservative approach" policy in FY2022-23 and FY2021-22.

What to watch

Bottom line: This is a disclosed and audited record, but the disclosures themselves tell a story of a company whose revenue has collapsed to near-zero while a regulator's penalty against its promoter goes unpaid for six years and a ₹24.69 crore tax demand sits unresolved for five. The clean audit opinions are real, but they sit alongside filings that contradict each other on internal audit, related-party dealings, and pending litigation. Watch whether the SEBI attachment proceeds, what the assessing officer finds, and whether the internal audit system reappears in the next audit.