India Homes Ltd Forensic Report - SOIC x StockScans Report

as of Sep 2026

India Homes' audit history has deteriorated from a clean opinion in FY2021 to a disclaimer of opinion in FY2026, with the same failures, inaccessible books, unverified inventories, and unsupported related-party transactions, persisting throughout. The company is simultaneously seeking shareholder approval to invest 122% of its net worth in a promoter-owned LLP with nil turnover, while its revenue has collapsed from ₹532 crore to ₹2.65 crore over six years.

Key findings

  1. Auditor disclaims opinion after six years of escalating failures Critical - Laxmikant Kabra & Co LLP issued an unqualified opinion for FY2021, a qualified opinion for FY2022, an adverse opinion for FY2024, and a disclaimer of opinion for FY2026, stating it could not obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence. The FY2026 disclaimer cites inaccessible SAP records, inventories of ₹136.96 crore not valued at lower of cost or net realisable value, and non-cash related-party purchases of ₹1.83 crore lacking commercial substance. The auditor also reported that proper books of account were not kept and that a material uncertainty exists over the company's ability to meet liabilities due within one year.
  2. Borrowings understate true debt: unredeemed shares, booked gains, pledged assets Critical - Preference shares of ₹64.19 crore, due for redemption in 2019, remain classified as a current liability, constituting non-compliance with the Companies Act. A ₹7.3 crore settlement gain was booked as exceptional income even though payment was not made by the 31 July 2026 deadline, overstating profit before tax by the same amount. The entire asset base, non-current and current, is pledged to lenders, and interest coverage is negative at -2.24x.
  3. Six-year record of regulatory penalties and an IBC admission Major - SEBI imposed a penalty for delayed shareholder approval of a director's appointment, and the ROC initiated criminal proceedings for non-filing of the cost audit report. NCLT admitted an insolvency petition in May 2024, stayed only after promoters deposited ₹2.07 crore with NCLAT. BSE penalties were paid for late shareholding-pattern and financial-result filings across multiple quarters.
  4. Adverse opinions for three years over unassessable disputed liabilities Major - The auditor issued adverse opinions for FY2024, FY2025, and FY2026 because documentary evidence for claims and litigations was not provided and no assessment under Ind AS 37 was made. A secured lender took possession of the factory, and an insurance claim of ₹18.79 crore from a 2008 incident remains pending before NCDRC.
  5. No impairment testing for five consecutive years Major - The company skipped impairment assessment of tangible assets, investments, and financial assets in each year from FY2022 through FY2026, leaving carrying values unsupported. For FY2022-23 and FY2023-24, the company's own Board's Reports acknowledge the failure to perform impairment reviews, while auditor's reports for FY2021-22, FY2024-25, and FY2025-26 flag the issue. Investments continued to be carried at cost without any provision for diminution.
  6. Promoter family holds all executive roles as stake falls to 34% Major - Promoter shareholding fell from 48.20% in December 2023 to 34.25%, with fresh pledging of ₹18.16 crore in April 2026. All three executive directors are promoters, and the non-executive director is the spouse of the Managing Director. Shareholder approvals for promoter appointments passed with only 43,018 non-interested votes cast.
  7. Revenue collapses from ₹532 crore to ₹2.65 crore Major - Revenue fell from ₹532 crore in FY2019 to ₹2.65 crore in the latest year, with the business pivoting to real-estate development-rights sales. The receivables-to-revenue ratio rose 62% in the latest year. Real estate activities contributed ₹24.25 crore of FY2026 revenue, the first appearance of this line.

What to watch

Bottom line: This is a record of progressive audit failure and regulatory enforcement, not a single event. The core risk is that the company's financial statements have not been reliable for three years, and the proposed related-party transactions would commit a large share of net worth to entities with no operating history. Watch the outcome of the auditor vote and whether the Level Enterprises investment proceeds.