Jauss Polymers Ltd Forensic Report - SOIC x StockScans Report

as of Aug 2026

Jauss Polymers Ltd presents a record of seven consecutive adverse audit opinions, a complete cessation of operations, and a full promoter exit mid-year to an acquirer that immediately proposed installing its own directors with pay guaranteed irrespective of losses. The company has nil revenue, negative net worth, and a history of unresolved loans and advances that it now writes off.

Key findings

  1. A zero-revenue subsidiary held for at least six years was divested for ₹3.94 crore during the promoter exit Major - Jauss Polymers held Innovative Containers Services Private Limited from at least FY2019-20 through FY2024-25, with the investment carried at ₹3.55 crore every year. ICSPL reported total revenues of ₹Nil for each of the years ended 31 March 2022, 31 March 2024, and 31 March 2025. In January 2025, the company sought shareholder approval to sell its shares in ICSPL for ₹3,94,44,000.
  2. Three sole-proprietorship auditors cycled through in six years, with the latest change proposed after the promoter's full exit Major - The statutory auditor changed from BGJC & Associates LLP to Agrawal Mahesh Kumar & Co at the 33rd AGM, then to Mahesh Yadav & Co at the 34th AGM, and now MRB & Associates is proposed at the 39th AGM. Mahesh Yadav & Co was appointed at a remuneration of ₹45,000 per annum plus GST, an 82% reduction from the predecessor's fee. MRB & Associates, the proposed incoming auditor, also provided a resource-certification certificate dated 4 February 2026 to the acquirer under the open offer triggered by the promoter's full exit.
  3. Deferred tax assets and employee-benefit provisions avoided since operations ceased, without actuarial support Minor - In FY2025-26, the company reported a deferred tax closing balance of zero and stated no deferred tax was recognised because management believes there is no reasonable certainty of future profits. Over the same period, the company made no additional provision for gratuity and leave encashment, asserting the current provision is adequate after transferring most employees. Management stated no actuarial valuation report was obtained because actuarial valuation is taken every three years.
  4. A ₹1.33 crore impairment was recognised in FY21 without the Value-in-Use test required by Ind AS 36 Minor - In FY2020-21, Jauss Polymers charged an impairment loss of ₹1.33 crore on Plant & Equipment and explicitly stated it "has not considered Value in Use for estimating Recoverable amount as per IndAs 36". The independent auditor's report included an Emphasis of Matter, a special call-out in the audit report, noting that management did not consider Value in Use under Ind AS 36 for the impairment provision.

What to watch

Bottom line: This is a shell of a listed company: operations ceased, revenue is nil, and the auditor has refused to sign off on the books for seven years running. The record is defined by a single operating unit sold to a related party at a halved price, a dormant subsidiary divested during a full promoter exit, and an acquirer now moving to install its own board with pay cheques guaranteed even in loss. Watch the AGM votes on the new directors and auditor, and whether the long-outstanding slump sale consideration is ever recovered.