Quick Ratios
Quarterly Results
Profit & Loss
Balance Sheet
Cash Flow
Ratios
Mkt Cap
Market Capitalization
₹7Cr
Rev Gr TTM
Revenue Growth TTM
-72.44%
Peer Comparison
Compare up to 10 companies side by side across valuation, profitability, and growth.

PARKERAC
VS
| Quarter | Mar 2023 | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 |
|---|
|
Growth YoY Revenue Growth YoY% | -78.9 | 7.5 | 106.7 | 67.7 | -50.7 | -73.3 | -46.5 | 3,221.7 | 1,570.6 | 266.7 | 31.3 | -97.3 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 53 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Operating Profit Operating ProfitCr |
| 63.8 | 13.9 | 57.2 | 8.7 | -42.6 | -211.1 | 26.1 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 35.1 | 24.0 |
Other Income Other IncomeCr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Interest Expense Interest ExpenseCr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Depreciation DepreciationCr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Growth YoY PAT Growth YoY% | | 283.3 | 471.4 | 114.8 | -130.6 | -672.7 | -81.7 | -33.3 | 144.1 | 93.7 | 113.6 | 83.3 |
| 80.4 | 10.9 | 55.8 | 5.6 | -50.0 | -233.3 | 19.1 | 0.1 | 1.3 | -4.0 | 31.1 | 7.5 |
| 2.3 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 0.2 | -0.7 | -1.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.3 | -0.1 | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Financial Year | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | TTM |
|---|
|
| 34.4 | -65.6 | -88.4 | -24.7 | -56.1 | 191.0 | -77.5 | 276.9 | -48.1 | 26.5 | 1,114.7 | -76.9 |
| 265 | 97 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 66 | 14 |
Operating Profit Operating ProfitCr |
| -3.8 | -10.0 | 3.8 | 5.3 | -7.8 | -3.6 | -43.4 | -7.2 | 17.2 | 22.5 | 0.1 | 8.3 |
Other Income Other IncomeCr | 11 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Interest Expense Interest ExpenseCr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Depreciation DepreciationCr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 39.0 | -61.9 | -54.0 | -38.7 | -1,419.2 | -14.0 | -218.1 | 58.7 | 172.3 | 63.3 | -119.0 | 440.7 |
| 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.6 | -17.9 | -7.0 | -99.2 | -10.9 | 15.1 | 19.5 | -0.3 | 4.5 |
| 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | -1.3 | -1.4 | -4.6 | -1.9 | 1.4 | 2.2 | -0.4 | 1.4 |
| Financial Year | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Sep 2025 |
|---|
Equity Capital Equity CapitalCr | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | -2 | -2 | -2 | -1 | -1 | 0 |
Current Liabilities Current LiabilitiesCr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Non Current Liabilities Non Current LiabilitiesCr | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Liabilities Total LiabilitiesCr |
Current Assets Current AssetsCr | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Non Current Assets Non Current AssetsCr | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Total Assets Total AssetsCr |
| Financial Year | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|
Operating Cash Flow Operating Cash FlowCr | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 |
Investing Cash Flow Investing Cash FlowCr | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 |
Financing Cash Flow Financing Cash FlowCr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Free Cash Flow Free Cash FlowCr | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| 206.7 | 133.5 | 262.0 | 340.5 | -79.6 | 159.6 | 13.0 | -37.5 | -108.4 | 79.3 | -126.8 |
CFO To EBITDA CFO To EBITDA% | -9.2 | -2.5 | 50.1 | 38.4 | -182.6 | 313.6 | 29.7 | -56.3 | -95.5 | 68.9 | 289.7 |
| Financial Year | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 |
|---|
Valuation Ratios Valuation Ratios |
Market Cap Market CapitalizationCr | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 8 |
Price To Earnings Price To Earnings | 7.8 | 0.0 | 68.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.9 | 8.8 | 0.0 |
Price To Sales Price To Sales | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 0.1 |
Price To Book Price To Book | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 2.1 |
| -0.3 | 0.0 | 13.2 | -0.4 | -23.2 | -16.0 | -4.0 | -6.9 | 5.8 | 8.2 | 97.2 |
Profitability Ratios Profitability Ratios |
| -1.2 | -1.1 | 100.0 | 72.5 | 100.0 | 32.2 | 100.0 | 31.1 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 5.3 |
| -3.8 | -10.0 | 3.8 | 5.3 | -7.8 | -3.6 | -43.4 | -7.2 | 17.2 | 22.5 | 0.1 |
| 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.6 | -17.9 | -7.0 | -99.2 | -10.9 | 15.1 | 19.5 | -0.3 |
| 7.3 | 3.8 | 1.6 | -0.1 | -9.2 | -11.9 | -34.7 | -34.1 | 19.1 | 22.1 | -1.4 |
| 6.6 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.7 | -9.8 | -12.6 | -67.0 | -38.2 | 21.6 | 26.1 | -5.2 |
| 5.5 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | -8.5 | -10.8 | -46.3 | -20.0 | 13.4 | 20.0 | -3.7 |
Operational Ratios Operational Ratios |
Solvency Ratios Solvency Ratios |
Liquidity Ratios Liquidity Ratios |
Parker Agrochem Exports Limited is an Indian listed entity strategically positioned at the intersection of specialized logistics infrastructure and high-volume commodity trading. Operating primarily from the **Kandla Port in Gujarat**, the company leverages its proximity to one of India’s premier government-recognized export-import hubs to provide critical storage solutions while engaging in the physical and derivative trading of precious metals and edible oils.
---
### **Strategic Infrastructure: The Kandla Port Advantage**
The company’s operational backbone is its specialized facility located at **Plot No. 3 & 4, Block 'H', New Kandla**. This location provides a significant competitive moat due to its direct integration with port logistics.
* **Asset Base:** The company owns and operates **14 specialized storage tanks** designed specifically for **petroleum products and edible oils**.
* **Logistics Integration:** The facility is equipped with dedicated **connecting pipelines** linked directly to the Port/Jetty. This allows for the seamless, high-efficiency loading and unloading of liquid cargo directly from vessels.
* **Revenue Model:** The primary revenue driver for this segment is **Tank Farm Rental**. To counter regional competition and market rent volatility, the company secures **firm contracts with reputable corporate clients**, ensuring a predictable and stable income stream.
---
### **Commodity Trading Operations & Market Pivot**
In recent fiscal cycles, Parker Agrochem has undergone a significant strategic pivot, transitioning from a pure-play infrastructure provider to a high-volume **Commodity and Bullion Trading** house.
* **Product Portfolio:** The trading desk focuses on high-value commodities, including:
* **Bullion:** Gold and Silver.
* **Edible Oils:** Imported Refined and Crude Palm Oils.
* **Derivatives:** Exchange-traded commodity derivatives.
* **Risk Management:** Management maintains a cautious stance on market positions due to extreme volatility. Notably, the company has previously **exited currency trading** to concentrate resources on core commodities where it possesses deeper market intelligence.
* **Segment Performance:** While this pivot has resulted in a **manifold increase in total turnover**, it operates on **thin margins**, making the company’s bottom line highly sensitive to volume fluctuations and operational cost increases.
---
### **Comparative Financial Performance & Key Metrics**
The shift in the business model is clearly reflected in the company’s financial ratios. The transition from high-margin rentals to high-volume trading has improved liquidity turnover but pressured debt service capabilities.
| Metric | FY 2024-25 | FY 2023-24 | FY 2022-23 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Interest Coverage Ratio** | **0.83** | **15.13** | **21.40** |
| **Debt Service Coverage Ratio** | **0.12** | **1.50** | **1.37** |
| **Debtors Turnover Ratio** | **12.31** | **5.99** | **4.67** |
| **Trade Payables Turnover** | **Improved 105.51%** | — | — |
| **Return on Equity (ROE)** | **Negative** | **Positive** | **Positive** |
**Financial Analysis Notes:**
* **Revenue Growth vs. Profitability:** Turnover has surged due to bullion trading; however, the most recent fiscal year saw a **net loss (PAT)**. This was driven by the combination of **thin trading margins**, a reduction in **rental income**, and rising **operating expenses**.
* **Solvency & Liquidity:** The **Interest Coverage Ratio** dropped sharply to **0.83**, signaling that current earnings are insufficient to comfortably cover interest obligations. Furthermore, the **Working Capital Ratio** has seen recent deterioration.
* **Capital Allocation:** Due to **accumulated losses** and meagre current profits, the company has **not declared dividends** nor transferred funds to general reserves in the recent period.
---
### **Corporate Governance & Organizational Structure**
Parker Agrochem maintains a lean corporate structure designed for direct management oversight.
* **Leadership:** The company is led by **Mr. Jagdish R. Acharya**, Managing Director. His leadership was recently reaffirmed with a three-year re-appointment effective from **March 31, 2024, through March 30, 2027**.
* **Structure:** The company operates as a **standalone entity**. It has **no subsidiaries, associates, or joint ventures**, ensuring a transparent and uncomplicated balance sheet.
* **Asset Valuation:** The Board of Directors asserts that all **current assets, loans, and advances** are realizable at their stated values. Provisions for **depreciation** and known liabilities are maintained at adequate levels.
---
### **Risk Profile & Regulatory Exposure**
The company faces a multifaceted risk environment, ranging from market-driven volatility to legislative changes regarding labor and social security.
#### **1. Regulatory & Labor Risk**
The Government of India’s notification of **New Labour Codes** on **November 21, 2025**, presents a pending regulatory hurdle.
* **Code on Social Security, 2020:** The company is monitoring the impact of this code on employee benefit costs.
* **Valuation Uncertainty:** As **State Government rules** are still under public consultation, the company has not yet finalized the revised financial impact on its long-term provisions.
#### **2. Defined Benefit Plan & Actuarial Risks**
The company manages significant long-term liabilities related to employee benefits, which are sensitive to macroeconomic shifts:
* **Interest Rate Risk:** A decline in the **G.Sec. (Government Security) Rate** increases the present value of liabilities, requiring higher provisions.
* **Investment & Concentration Risk:** Plan assets are currently concentrated with a **single insurance company**. While compliant with **Rule 101 of Income Tax Rules, 1962**, a default by the insurer represents a significant counterparty risk.
* **Salary Risk:** If actual salary increments exceed the assumed actuarial rates, the total liability of the plan will escalate.
#### **3. Operational & Market Risks**
* **Capacity Pressure:** The storage segment faces intense pricing competition due to **increased tank farm capacity** in the Kandla region.
* **Margin Fragility:** The high-volume trading business is vulnerable to even minor shifts in commodity prices or transaction costs, as evidenced by the recent transition to a net loss despite higher turnover.