Swadeshi Industries & Leasing Ltd Forensic Report - SOIC x StockScans Report

as of Aug 2026

Swadeshi Industries & Leasing Ltd's record carries six consecutive unmodified audit opinions, but the clean opinions sit on top of a year of contradictions. Revenue quadrupled while cash from operations stayed negative, the company acquired its first subsidiary through a share allotment that its own secretarial auditor says breached the Companies Act, and the same reports that certify no penalties also document unpaid BSE fines.

Key findings

  1. Revenue quadrupled while operating cash stayed deeply negative Major - Revenue grew from ₹17.15 crore in FY25 to ₹68.46 crore in FY26, a fourfold jump, with receivables days at 112. Profit after tax was ₹1.73 crore, but operating cash flow was minus ₹2.27 crore, a CFO/PAT ratio of -1.31x, the second straight year of negative cash conversion. The cash flow statement also notes direct taxes are treated as operating activities, not split between investing and financing.
  2. First subsidiary acquired via share allotment at 24x face value, restated retroactively Major - Swadeshi Agrotech Industries Pvt Ltd allotted 3,50,000 shares at ₹240 each (face value ₹10) to the holding company on 1 October 2025, for ₹8.4 crore, giving a 73.30% stake. The FY2024-25 comparatives were restated as if the combination existed from 1 April 2024, with the note itself saying this "should not be read as indicating" legal shareholding before the allotment. The secretarial audit says no Section 186 resolution was passed and Regulation 30 disclosure was not complied with.
  3. Repeated approvals to lend ₹25 crore to director-controlled entities while borrowing from the same promoters Major - The FY2025-26 AGM notice seeks approval for loans up to ₹25 crore to entities where directors have "direct and indirect control". A postal ballot dated 21 April 2025 sought approval to borrow up to ₹5 crore from directors and promoters, convertible into equity at the lender's option. The Board's Report says no materially significant related-party transactions conflict with company interest, and Form AOC-2 was not enclosed.
  4. Three statutory auditor changes in 16 months, two mid-tenure resignations Major - Harish Hegde & Company resigned effective 31 January 2024, citing the partner's lymphoma diagnosis. D G S M & Co. was appointed 12 February 2024 and resigned effective 30 April 2024, "as the firm decided to resign from audit of all listed companies". G C A S and Associates LLP filled the vacancy at an EGM on 27 May 2024.
  5. Unmodified opinions every year, but a signature block dated one year early and secretarial qualifications Major - The FY2026 standalone P&L signature block shows Executive Director Balkrishna Sharma dated "28-May-2025", a year before the report date, while the cash flow signature block shows "Lalkrishna Sharma" dated 28-May-2025. The FY2026 secretarial audit qualified on Section 203 KMP appointment compliance and flagged the Section 186 breach. The FY2025 IFC opinion referenced "31st March 2024" instead of 31 March 2025.
  6. BSE fines for late filings went unpaid for three years while the company certified no penalties Major - The FY2019-20 secretarial audit flags non-submission of the Annual Report under Regulation 34, with a BSE fine unpaid as of that report. The FY2020-21 and FY2021-22 secretarial audits add Regulation 23(9) related-party disclosure non-compliance, with fines still unpaid. The same years' Corporate Governance reports state "No penalties or strictures imposed" by the Stock Exchange or SEBI.
  7. "No debts" in gearing disclosures while a secured term loan and overdraft facilities exist Major - The FY2024-25 gearing note says "There is no Debts in the company" and reports gearing as Nil, while the same report's Note 24 discloses bank overdraft facilities terminable without notice. The FY2025-26 statements disclose a term loan from SVC Co-operative Bank Ltd of ₹2,26,269 current maturity, secured by mortgage on an Andheri East property, repayable in 100 monthly instalments of ₹67,093. Earmarked bank balances "can be utilised only for the specific identified purposes".

What to watch

Bottom line: This is a record of unmodified opinions and zero pledged shares, but the substance beneath the opinions is where the risk concentrates. The company's own secretarial auditor has documented a Section 186 breach, unpaid BSE fines contradict the company's own no-penalty certifications, and a subsidiary was consolidated as if it existed a year before it legally did. The character of the risk is governance and disclosure reliability, watch the AGM votes and the warrant conversion outcome.