Vibrant Global Capital Ltd Forensic Report - SOIC x StockScans Report

as of Sep 2026

Vibrant Global Capital's audit record is clean on its face: seven consecutive unqualified opinions. But the group paid large premiums to buy out minority shareholders without testing that goodwill for impairment, and its borrowings are secured by director-owned property and personal guarantees while the capital-management note claims the company has no debt.

Key findings

  1. The group paid large premiums to buy out minority shareholders, creating untested goodwill Major - Vibrant Global Capital acquired non-controlling interests in two subsidiaries in 2021 and 2023, paying ₹3.00 crore and ₹1.33 crore against intrinsic values of ₹1.58 crore and ₹41.43 lakh, with the excess booked as goodwill. The accounting policy requires impairment assessment at each reporting period end, and states goodwill impairment is never reversed. No impairment has been recognized.
  2. Seven years of unqualified opinions, with the auditor leaning on other auditors for large subsidiaries Major - The FY2025-26 consolidated opinion was unmodified, but two subsidiaries not audited by the group auditor held ₹87.79 crore of assets and ₹154.69 crore of revenue. In FY2024-25, two other-audited subsidiaries contributed ₹70.91 crore of assets and ₹261.44 crore of revenue, with a net loss of ₹8.03 crore. Earlier years carried an Emphasis of Matter on COVID-related verification limits.
  3. Profit is shaped by fair-value gains, an exceptional property assignment, and an NCLT amalgamation Major - The Board attributed FY2021-22's PAT jump to ₹46.09 crore from ₹19.37 crore to "buoyant capital market" fair-value gains on the share portfolio. In FY2025-26, the company assigned rights from a property dispute for ₹1.48 crore against ₹58 lakh advanced, booking the surplus as an Exceptional Item. An NCLT-approved amalgamation with an appointed date of 1 April 2021 forced restated comparatives.
  4. Borrowings are secured by director property and guarantees, yet the capital note says there is no debt Major - The FY2025-26 notes disclose loans secured by a director-owned Oberoi Three Sixty West flat, plus hypothecation of stock, book debts and personal guarantees of directors. The capital-management note states "In the absence of any debt, the maintenance of debt equity ratio etc. may not be of any relevance" in FY2023-24, FY2022-23, FY2021-22 and FY2019-20. However, the same notes show net debt of ₹2,390.34 lakh, ₹3,542.35 lakh and ₹5,798.44 lakh in their gearing ratio tables. The FY2019-20 AGM notice reported total indebtedness of ₹19.55 crore at year-start and ₹13.06 crore at year-end.
  5. A promoter family runs the board with nil executive pay and near-zero shareholder dissent Major - Chairman & MD Vinod Garg and WTD & CFO Vaibhav Garg drew no remuneration in FY2021-22 through FY2024-25. Promoters voted 100% of their shares in favour at the 30th AGM on 30 September 2025, while public non-institutions polled just 6.57% of shares held. Independent Director Mr. Kaushik Agrawal held 80,36,900 shares as of the 28th AGM notice dated 25 August 2023.
  6. Related-party dealings centre on interest-free promoter loans and a corporate guarantee Major - In FY2019-20, KMP Vaibhav Garg accepted loans of ₹10.09 crore and repaid ₹16.99 crore, with a fair-value charge of ₹1.84 crore on the interest-free element. The company also gave a ₹40.30 crore corporate guarantee to State Bank of India for a subsidiary. No material related-party transactions were disclosed in FY2024-25.
  7. Operating cash flow swings wildly against positive profit, with no dividend paid Minor - FY2025-26 standalone CFO was negative ₹18.65 crore against PAT of ₹17.48 crore, while FY2024-25 CFO was positive ₹47.62 crore against a ₹0.47 crore loss. No dividend was recommended for FY2021-22. ROCE fell to 10.68% in FY2025-26 from 30.61% in FY2023-24.

What to watch

Bottom line: This is a disclosed and audited record with a clean opinion streak, but the assurance is thinner than it looks, the group auditor has repeatedly relied on other auditors for subsidiaries carrying the bulk of revenue. The risk sits in three places: untested goodwill from minority buyouts, a capital note that contradicts the actual borrowing disclosures, and profit that leans on fair-value gains and exceptional items.