Adani Energy Solutions Ltd Forensic Report - SOIC x StockScans Report

as of Jul 2026

Adani Energy Solutions carries a clean cash-conversion record, operating cash flow has covered reported profit in every year since FY21, but the audit file tells a different story. Two consecutive qualified opinions, two active SEBI show-cause notices, a US DOJ/SEC action against a director, and ₹29,299 crore of corporate guarantees sit alongside persistent audit-trail gaps and a restructuring reserve of ₹5,321 crore that routed losses around the profit-and-loss account.

Key findings

  1. Two SEBI show-cause notices and a US DOJ/SEC action against a director are pending Major - SEBI issued show-cause notices on a former auditor’s Peer Review Certificate and on shareholding categorisation for FY2012-2020. A non-executive director was indicted by the US DOJ on securities fraud and wire fraud conspiracy charges and named in a parallel SEC civil complaint; the director’s counsel has filed for dismissal and the matter remains pending. Stock exchanges fined the company ₹59,000 each for board-composition lapses under Listing Regulation 17(1A).
  2. Audit opinions were qualified for two consecutive years, and audit-trail gaps persisted across three years Major - The statutory auditor qualified the FY2023-24 and FY2022-23 opinions, stating it could not comment on adjustments or disclosures arising from a Short Seller Report and pending SEBI investigations. The FY2022-23 auditor also identified a material weakness in internal financial controls over external examination of allegations. Audit-trail gaps continued: in FY2025-26 the edit-log feature was disabled for direct database changes in one accounting software from 27 May to 12 December 2025.
  3. Intra-group loans reached ₹10,847.76 crore, and interest is capitalised rather than paid in cash Major - Standalone loans to subsidiaries stood at ₹10,847.76 crore at FY26 year-end, up from ₹8,253.17 crore in FY25 and ₹5,062.47 crore in FY24. Interest accrued on inter-corporate deposits given to related parties was converted to loan principal rather than received in cash. In FY23, a ₹1,470 crore loan to Adani Transmission (Stepco) Limited was overdue for more than 90 days and loans falling due were extended by modifying terms.
  4. Contingent liabilities are dominated by ₹29,299 crore in corporate guarantees, and a ₹1,381.28 crore claim awaits Supreme Court hearing Major - Corporate guarantees for subsidiaries rose from ₹10,498.60 crore at March 2025 to ₹29,299 crore at March 2026. AEML faces a ₹1,381.28 crore claim by Vidarbha Industries Power Ltd for increased fuel cost, pending final hearing in the Supreme Court as of 17 August 2023. A disputed service tax demand of ₹353.55 crore awaits appeals before the Bombay High Court and CESTAT.
  5. The Group repeatedly uses asset-acquisition classification, changed asset useful lives multiple times in both directions, and booked a ₹5,321 crore restructuring reserve on a common-control transfer Major - During FY2022-23, AESL transferred net liabilities of ₹7,462.92 crore to ATSOL and recognised the ₹5,321.04 crore difference as a Restructuring reserve in Other Equity. AEML changed the useful life of meters from 25 to 10 years effective April 2020, then back to 25 years for assets approved after August 2024. The Group classifies every acquisition of transmission SPVs as asset acquisitions, not business combinations, stating the SPVs have no employees or significant processes.
  6. Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP exited after issuing a qualified opinion; Walker Chandiok & Co LLP was appointed and total audit and network-firm fees rose from ₹2.87 crore to ₹6.28 crore Major - Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP qualified the FY2022-23 financial statements and was replaced by Walker Chandiok & Co LLP for a five-year term from the 2023 AGM. Consolidated fees paid to statutory auditors and network firms rose from ₹2.87 crore in FY2022-23 to ₹6.28 crore in FY2024-25. In FY2024-25, non-audit services and expense reimbursements together exceeded the audit fee of ₹2.70 crore.
  7. Revenue repeatedly includes large, lumpy true-ups from multi-year regulatory orders, and the company books no impairment against receivables Minor - The Group recognised ₹148.51 crore in FY2024-25 and ₹656.22 crore in FY2022-23 from multi-year MERC truing-up orders, each time stating that figures were not comparable with prior years. Consolidated trade receivables stood at ₹5,734 crore as of FY2025-26, with receivable days at 76 in FY26, 65 in FY25, and 82 in FY24 [SQL]. Management considers all transmission receivables fully recoverable and recognises no impairment loss.
  8. Operating cash flow comfortably covers reported profit, but heavy capex keeps free cash flow deeply negative Clean - Cumulative CFO of ₹37,738 crore exceeded cumulative PAT of ₹8,318 crore over FY21 to FY26. Free cash flow was negative ₹3,435 crore in FY26 as total capex reached ₹14,232 crore. The company completed a QIP of ₹8,373.10 crore in August 2024 and did not recommend any dividend for FY22, FY23, FY24, FY25, or FY26.

What to watch

Bottom line: This is a regulated utility with genuine operating cash generation and a disclosed, audited record. The risk sits in three places: the unresolved regulatory actions that have already produced two qualified audit opinions, the ₹29,299 crore of corporate guarantees that sit outside reported borrowings, and the pattern of intra-group loans where interest accrues but cash does not return. Watch the SEBI adjudication, the Supreme Court hearing, and whether the QIP proceeds as authorised.