Key Takeaways
- Bookings swing from decline to surge: H1 bookings fell YoY, but Q2 bookings jumped 147% QoQ to ₹432 cr, powered by the Arvind Everland launch which alone contributed ₹400 cr at 82% absorption.
- Profitability compressed YoY, rebounding sequentially: H1 revenue, EBITDA and PAT all declined materially versus last year, yet Q2 saw sequential growth of 38% in revenue, 27% in EBITDA and 51% in PAT, with operating cash flow at ₹125 cr.
- Sustenance sales deliberately deprioritized: Management acknowledged a weak quarter for sustenance sales, attributing it to a strategic choice to divert resources toward the large Everland launch rather than any market rejection of the company.
- H2 launch pipeline is the make-or-break for guidance: Management is targeting 4-5 launches in H2, bringing ₹2,500-3,000 cr to market, and remains confident of hitting the 30-35% presales growth and ₹4,000 cr BD addition targets for the year.
- What to watch next quarter: Whether approvals for the two Bangalore projects and the Baroda launch arrive in time for a Q3 launch, the pace of the promised sustenance sales recovery, and any progress on the delayed Surat project.
The Everland Effect: Bookings, Mix and the Quarter's Shape
- One launch dominated the quarter: Arvind Everland in Mankol, launched toward the end of Q2, generated ₹400 cr in bookings from 954 units, representing 82% of launched inventory and driving the 147% QoQ bookings jump.
- Sustenance sales were a casualty of focus: Management made a deliberate call to concentrate selling energy on Everland, a project requiring roughly 900 unit sales at smaller ticket sizes, which pulled resources away from sustenance projects. The company acknowledged the result was "not something which we are very excited about" and that it "could have done better."
- Market feedback was mixed, not company-specific: Management noted that market feedback was "probably not most robust for everyone" and that many other developers gave similar feedback, framing the softness as a broader condition rather than a company-specific issue.
- Collections lumpy but the half-year run rate holds: Q1 free cash flow was just ₹25 cr versus Q2's ₹125 cr, adding to ₹150 cr for H1. Management attributes this to quarter-on-quarter variability normal for a smaller-base company and argues the trajectory over a two-year block stays consistent with 25-30% fresh sales growth.
Kamal Singal: "So to tell you very frankly, Amit, I think sustenance sales for the quarter were not something which we are very excited about. We did feel we could have done better."
H2 Launch Pipeline and the Guidance Bet
- 4-5 launches targeted, weighted toward the second half of H2: Two Bangalore projects are in advanced approval stages and targeted for Q3 or Q4, the Baroda project is targeted for Q4, and the Pen-Khapoli Mumbai project plus an industrial project are also targeted for Q4. Approvals are expected from November onward, and management is still aiming to bring some launches in Q3 if approvals are secured in time.
- The quantum is large and phase-dependent: Management is looking to bring approximately ₹2,500-3,000 cr to market in H2, but notes that Pen-Khopoli and the industrial project are very large and may require phase-wise launches.
- Sustenance recovery is a parallel bet: Management expressed confidence that sustenance sales will pick up from Q3 onward, citing approvals expected from November, fully mobilized teams, and expected momentum.
- Surat remains a drag with no firm timeline: The Surat project has taken longer than anticipated and longer than the company's track record, with approvals and revenue issues being resolved but at a slower pace. Management says it "should be launched this financial year" but offers no specific quarter. Baroda is expected to compensate in the medium term.
- Guidance confidence rests on launch absorption rates: Management points to the 82% absorption achieved on Everland in 3-4 days during the September quarter as evidence of strong launch execution, and states the healthy H2 pipeline gives confidence in achieving the 30-35% presales growth guidance for the year.
Business Development: The ₹4,000 cr Target and Funding Capacity
- BD target is independent of launch delays: Management reiterated the ₹4,000 cr BD addition target for the year, emphasizing that BD is a strategic long-term decision not linked to approval timelines for launches. The pipeline is described as healthy across Mumbai, Bangalore and Gujarat, though the company remains opportunistic.
- Funding headroom is substantial: Management estimates debt of ₹300-400 cr is easily doable, with an additional ₹150-200 cr expected from operations going forward, surplus cash on the books, and total headroom of ₹600-700 cr before even considering the HDFC platform. The HDFC platform is fully paid back with no outstanding, and available as higher-cost, last-resort capital.
- Deal mix stays asset-light with selective exceptions: The company will continue with a mix of ownership and JDA, with JDA remaining the focus for its asset-light profile. However, with cash on the books, management is open to outright deals if they are very lucrative.
- MMR deals under discussion are sizable: JDAs under active discussion in MMR are in the ₹500 cr to ₹1,000 cr range and are at a more advanced stage.
Kamal Singal: "And HDFC platform today is totally paid back. Today, there is no outstanding as far as HDFC platform is concerned, but that money on tap is available."
Geographic Expansion: New Cities and Deepening Presence
- Vadodara entry as "Ahmedabad plus 1": The company entered Vadodara with a ~98-acre JDA project carrying ~₹700 cr topline potential and 68% revenue share to ASL. Management views Vadodara as a market with consumer segmentation, offering and pricing very similar to Ahmedabad premium, where 90% of the market is occupied by local developers and a brand like Arvind should make sense. The city is growing fast on the industrial side with newer industries being set up.
- Bangalore is a multi-city opportunity: Management describes Bangalore as "10 markets put together," with each micro market sizable enough to support five projects and at least 10 such micro markets. The company states it has "not even scratched the surface" and needs to become "really meaningful and visible" there.
- Mumbai carries both strategic and personal weight: The company is looking at multiple assets in Mumbai independent of the Pen-Khopoli launch. The executive leading the effort noted an "emotional attachment beyond the numbers" and familiarity with the market.
- Ahmedabad gets a Commonwealth Games tailwind: The formalization of the Commonwealth Games for Ahmedabad is seen as a positive trigger bringing tangible positives in volume, value and prices, with horizontal projects expected to get significant momentum.
- Large land parcels will be phased carefully: Aqua City and the Adroda project are described as LTVCs spanning more than 600-700 acres, which will need to be phased out very carefully.
Kamal Singal: "Bangalore is not Bangalore. Bangalore is like 10 markets put together and together called as Bangalore."
Organizational Build-Out: Structure, Hires and Investment Ahead of Growth
- New organizational design is live: The company has moved to a structure with strong functional heads at the center and city business heads running small versions of a city P&L for last-mile decision-making, executed over the last couple of quarters. The stated philosophy is to combine agility with control, given the many moving pieces and high-impact financial decisions in real estate.
- CXO and mid-management layers are being filled: Dharmesh Vyas joined as COO with three decades of experience, Amit Chamaria joined as CFO, and Priyansh Kapoor joined with knowledge of executing at scale and familiarity with a large market. Below the CXO level, Level 2 mid-managers and senior mid-managers are being strengthened consistently, with the company investing ahead of time.
- Team expansion is market-weighted: Bangalore and Gujarat are expanding faster because that is where inventory is currently available, though the team is being augmented in all markets to handle growing scale and multiple launches per quarter.
- The build-out is gradual, not a single event: Management notes that building out the team happens gradually quarter-on-quarter and month-on-month, with no specific completion date.
Kulin Lalbhai: "we need a combination of agility and control. I think in real estate, both of those are very critical because there are a lot of moving pieces. And still there are many decisions which have very large impact financially."
Collection Cycles and Business Planning Assumptions
- Horizontal projects collect over roughly 3 years: For a midsized plotting project, sales happen over 1.5-3 years with payment terms of 2-2.5 years, yielding a total collection cycle of around 3 years. At launch, management targets 70-80% inventory sold and considers 40% absorption at launch as good for business planning.
- Vertical projects sell through by completion: With a 48-month execution cycle, the company targets selling 30-40% of inventory at launch and 95-100% by project completion.
- Unrealized operating cash flow exceeds ₹4,110 cr from the current pipeline.
Guidance & Commitments
| Commitment | Specifics | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Presales growth | 30-35% growth for FY26 | FY26 |
| H2 launches | 4-5 projects including two Bangalore, Baroda, Pen-Khapoli Mumbai, and an industrial project; ₹2,500-3,000 cr brought to market | H2 FY26 (some targeted Q3 if approvals secured, others Q4) |
| Business development addition | ₹4,000 cr for the year | FY26 |
| Sustenance sales recovery | Pick-up expected as approvals arrive and teams mobilize | Q3 FY26 onward |
| Baroda project launch | Launch within the financial year | Q4 FY26 (or next quarter "for sure") |
| Surat project launch | Launch within the financial year, pending approval and revenue issue resolution | FY26 (no specific quarter) |
| Growth aspiration | Continue to grow 35-40% | Going forward |
Key Metrics
| Metric | Q2 FY26 |
|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹140 cr, vs ₹266 cr in Q2 FY25; sequential growth of 38% |
| EBITDA | ₹31 cr, vs ₹83 cr in Q2 FY25; 27% QoQ increase |
| PAT | ₹18 cr, vs ₹43 cr in Q2 FY25; 51% QoQ growth |
| Bookings | ₹432 cr, vs ₹464 cr in Q2 FY25; sequential growth of 147% |
| Collections | ₹236 cr, vs ₹263 cr in Q2 FY25; sequential improvement of 23% |
| Operating cash flow | ₹125 cr, 4% YoY growth and 368% QoQ growth |
| Net debt | ₹(32) cr (net cash), vs ₹(50) cr as on June 30, 2025 |
| H1 FY26 bookings | ₹607 cr, vs ₹666 cr in H1 FY25 |
| H1 FY26 revenue | ₹242 cr, vs ₹340 cr in H1 FY25 |
| H1 FY26 operating cash flow | ₹152 cr |
| Unrealized operating cash flow from current pipeline | Exceeding ₹4,110 cr |
| Arvind Everland launch absorption | 82% of launched inventory, 954 units booked for ₹400 cr, achieved in 3-4 days |
| H2 FY26 planned launch inventory | Close to ₹3,000 cr of stock to be brought to market |
| FY26 business development target | ₹4,000 cr in project additions |
| New Vadodara project topline potential | ~₹700 cr, 68% revenue share to ASL under JDA, spread over ~98 acres |