Key Takeaways
- Moderate demand, margin squeeze: Consolidated revenue grew 5% YoY, held back by Butterfly’s 16% decline, while EBITDA margins contracted 160 bps on BEE-related fan cost increases and brand investments.
- Premiumisation is the bright spot: Premium fans grew 30%+ YoY and now account for ~28% of the fan portfolio, while appliances delivered 17% growth, led by water heaters crossing 10 lakh units sold.
- BEE transition still a drag: The regulatory shift to star-rated fans raised input costs that have not been fully passed on; one 1-1.5% price increase was taken in September, with more likely needed.
- Butterfly merger called off, synergies stay on: The amalgamation failed the minority vote, but management insists the operational integration track continues, targeting 7-10% cost reduction on Butterfly’s ~₹800 crore addressable cost base.
- What to watch next quarter: Whether festive demand materialises as expected, the pace and success of further fan price increases, and any margin recovery in ECD as BEE costs are passed through.
Demand Environment
- Consumer demand still moderate: Management described the environment as challenging, with discretionary purchases softer than anticipated due to inflationary pressures and lower consumer confidence, though an uptick was visible from September onward.
- Festive shift hurt Butterfly: Butterfly’s 16% YoY revenue decline was partly attributed to the festive season shifting into Q3 and a one-off corporate sale in the base quarter; retail and modern trade channels continued to grow despite the slowdown.
- E-commerce doubled: The e-commerce channel nearly doubled versus the same quarter last year, crossing ₹100 crore per quarter, and management hopes the momentum sustains.
- GT channel steady: General trade is working in line with the market, with no significant fill-in or stocking happening.
Promeet Ghosh: “Frankly, I do not think anybody in the market quite understands why this may be exactly so.”
Fans: Premiumisation vs. BEE Margin Drag
- Premium segment surged: Premium fans grew over 30% YoY, lifting premium saliency to about 28%, up 250 bps YoY. Crompton now claims the largest range of premium BLDC fans.
- TPW fans outpacing the category: The high-speed segment led growth, supported by laddering actions and new launches that boosted premium presence.
- BEE transition raised costs structurally: The shift to star-rated fans from 1 January introduced incremental input costs that have not been fully passed on, compressing ECD margins. Management clarified this is a structural product-cost shift, not a channel mix issue.
- Price action started, more likely: A 1-1.5% price increase was taken across the portfolio in September; management indicated one or two more rounds may be needed, depending on festive demand.
- In-housing for cost control: Crompton began manufacturing the sub-economy fan segment in-house, a strategic move to improve cost structures and step up capacity utilisation of its own plants. The in-housing journey will expand over the next few quarters.
Promeet Ghosh: “I can’t say a lot of our competitors followed, but we took pricing increases, showing our intent on protecting margins in the last quarter and we will see how that goes.”
Appliances & Built-in Kitchen: Growth Bets
- Appliances grew 17% YoY: Both large and small domestic appliances contributed, with kitchen appliances propelled by mixer grinders (new 750-watt model) and the kettle category doubling.
- Water heaters hit a milestone: The category sold over 10 lakh units, its highest ever, translating to a 10%+ market share.
- Large kitchen appliances scaling: Revenue run rate climbed to ₹5 crore per month from ₹2 crore previously, driven by channel expansion and a material increase in exclusive brand outlets. The 75th signature store was opened during the quarter.
- Built-in appliances still in investment mode: The business is being incubated with upfront investments that will keep it loss-making for a few more quarters before scale drives profitability. Product portfolio refreshes and new sub-categories are in the pipeline.
Butterfly: Merger Off, Synergies On
- Amalgamation withdrawn: The scheme received three-fourths of equity shareholder votes but failed the majority-of-minority test. Crompton will continue as the 75% controlling shareholder.
- Operational integration continues: Management was explicit that the legal track ending does not derail cost and revenue synergy capture.
- Cost synergy quantified: Butterfly has an addressable cost base of ~₹800 crore. Crompton sees 7-10% cost reduction potential across warehousing, logistics and after-sales service, with benefits starting to evolve as this fiscal closes and moving into early next fiscal.
Kaleeswaran A.: “What Butterfly gave us an opportunity is to look at... about say Rs. 800 crores sitting in there... We think Crompton and Butterfly coming together in this area, there is a good headroom for us to look at 7%, 8%, 10% cost reduction on that base, which would start evolving as we close this fiscal and move into early next fiscal.”
Pumps & Lighting: Mixed Signals
- Pumps delivered strong growth: Agri sector grew 17% and residential submersibles grew 20% YoY. Quality improvement actions and a focus on panel sales significantly improved the attachment ratio for panels. A new brand architecture was deployed, adding Shield and Smart series variants.
- Lighting B2C remains tough: Industry-level price erosion kept competition taut, though EBIT margins improved 250 bps on cost optimisation and product mix.
- B2B lighting showing early recovery: Demand was flattish, marking early signs of stabilisation. A new sales structure was implemented from 1 September to strengthen go-to-market.
Margins & Profitability
- Consolidated margin decline: EBITDA margins fell 160 bps YoY, partly from lower material margins (31.3%) and partly from higher investments in brand and capability building. PAT declined 13% excluding a one-off tax adjustment.
- ECD margin pressure is structural, not channel-driven: The decline stems from the BEE-mandated product-cost increase for star-rated fans, not from any shift in channel mix.
- Butterfly EBITDA at 8.2%: Margins reflected ongoing investments in people capabilities and brand building.
- Growth over margin expansion: Management prioritises profit growth over near-term margin expansion, stating structural unit economics will not be sacrificed, but declined to provide EBIT margin guidance.
Kaleeswaran A.: “We do not want to get into a near-term EBIT margin guidance. As we talked about, we are conscious of the fact that we need to grow the business and deliver profit growth rather than profitability expansion.”
Guidance & Commitments
| Commitment | Specifics | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Butterfly cost synergies | 7-10% reduction on ~₹800 crore addressable cost base across warehousing, logistics, after-sales service | Starting as this fiscal closes, moving into early next fiscal |
| Fan price increases | One 1-1.5% increase taken in September; one or two more rounds may be needed to restore margins | Dependent on festive demand scenario |
| Built-in appliances profitability | Losses will continue while business is incubated | A few more quarters before scale helps profitability |
| In-housing of fan manufacturing | Sub-economy segment manufacturing brought in-house; seed category in-housing to expand | Next few quarters |
| Alternate channel expansion | Continued step-up of e-commerce, modern trade and RCS channels | Ongoing |
Key Metrics
| Metric | Q2 FY24 |
|---|---|
| Consolidated revenue growth | 5% YoY |
| ECD segment growth | 17% YoY, industry leading |
| Pumps segment growth | 10% YoY, led by Agri at 17% YoY |
| Lighting segment growth | -11% YoY, decline due to industry challenges in bulbs, battens, ceiling lights |
| Butterfly revenue | ₹308 cr, decline of 16% YoY due to festive season shift and one-off corporate sales in Q2 FY23 |
| Consolidated material margin | 31.3% |
| Consolidated EBITDA margin | 9.8%, down about 1.6 ppt partly due to lower material margins and higher brand and capability investments |
| Lighting EBIT margin | 10.5%, improved from 8.5%, up 250 bps |
| Butterfly EBITDA margin | 8.2%, EBITDA of ₹25 cr post investments in people and brand |
| Consolidated PAT decline | ~13% YoY, excluding one-off tax adjustment |
| Standalone PAT decline | 5.6% YoY, on a like-for-like basis |
| Net debt | ₹261 cr, versus ₹145 cr as of 30th June 2023 |
| Dividend paid | ₹192 cr |
| Premium fans saliency | ~28%, about 2.5 ppt higher than previous year |
| E-commerce revenue | >₹100 cr per quarter, doubled over previous year |
| Alternate channel saliency | 17%, improved from about 13% in Q2 FY23 |
| A&P spends growth | 31% YoY |
| Water heater units sold | >10 lakh units, highest ever for a quarter |
| Water heater market share | >10% |
| Residential pumps market share | ~30% |
| Large kitchen appliances revenue run rate | ~₹5 cr per month, versus about ₹2 cr in the previous month |
| Built-in kitchen appliances EBITDA loss | ~₹6.5 cr in Q2, on revenue of ₹14 cr; H1 loss of ~₹14 cr |
| BEE transition cost increase | ~15% on account of energy rating transition; ~8%-9% met via cost decreases and value engineering |
| Price increase taken in September | ~1% to 1.5% across the portfolio |
| H1 marketing spend increase | 50% YoY |
| Fans manufacturing footprint | ~50:50 in-house vs outsourced |