Key Takeaways
- Gold NPA recovery drove record PAT: A sharp drop in gold loan NPAs triggered an Rs 18 crore provision reversal, swinging the bank from a Rs 97 crore charge in Q1 to a record profit.
- Gold loan book degrew, but the worst is over: The portfolio shrank QoQ under a lower LTV regime, yet management says asset quality concerns have ebbed and the book has started growing again in the current quarter.
- Costs are rising faster than the bank can grow: Staff count jumped 33% YoY and branch count rose to 542, with the full opex impact of these hires still to hit; the bank has now slowed both branch and employee expansion.
- Non-gold growth is stuck in low gear: SME and wholesale lending shrank as the bank refused to join a price war, while new retail products are too small to move the needle; real volume growth remains a gold loan story for now.
- What to watch next quarter: Whether the promised Q3 gold NPA recovery materialises, whether SME pipeline converts into actual disbursements, and how much the full-quarter staff cost impact pressures the cost-to-income ratio.
Gold Loan Portfolio: The Recovery Engine
- NPA reversal mechanics: Gold loan NPAs fell from Rs 353 crore to Rs 287 crore, cutting interest reversals from Rs 23 crore (Q1) to just Rs 2.21 crore (Q2); this mechanical effect lifted reported gold loan yield by 162 bps QoQ and flipped provisions from a Rs 97 crore charge to an Rs 18 crore reversal.
- Recovery strategy: The bank does not pursue auction as a first solution, treating it as a last resort; auction-related losses recognised this quarter were only Rs 88 lakhs. SMA accounts were brought down from Rs 400 crore to Rs 269 crore borrower-wise.
- Why NPAs built up: Higher loan-to-value permitted during the prior year, combined with flat gold prices that left borrowers unable to sell or redeem jewellery without loss.
- Competitive pressure rising: Rival gold loan companies are using direct marketing agencies that deliver gold loans at home with larger ticket sizes; the bank signed one or two agencies but got no traction because they demanded exclusivity the bank would not grant.
Rajendran: "Gold loan NPA has become a reality mainly because of this higher loan to asset value, which we have permitted during the last year."
Cost Structure: Expansion Bites Before Growth Arrives
- Staff cost surge: Employee count rose 33% YoY from 3,668 to 4,879, with most hires joining in the last quarter; the full impact has not yet been felt. AS-15 provisions jumped from Rs 18 crore to Rs 38 crore, including Rs 15 crore from a DA purchase for pensioners.
- Branch-led opex: Non-staff opex rose on branch expansion (421 to 541 YoY) plus higher repairs, maintenance and IT charges. Branch openings are now confined to Tamil Nadu, Andhra and Telangana where traction exists; Maharashtra and North expansion is on hold until existing branches break even.
- Cost-to-income distortion: Regulatory format changes, where bad recovery is now netted from NPA provisions instead of other income and investment provisions are netted from profit on sale, have inflated the reported cost-to-income ratio; under the old method it would have been around 51%.
- Expansion slowdown: Management confirmed the slowdown in branch and employee expansion is structural, not temporary; new branches will only open where breakeven within 18 months is achievable.
Non-Gold Lending: Stuck in a Price War
- SME and wholesale contraction: The bank lost more accounts than it gained as competitors took B-rated accounts at 7.5%-8% while CSB charges ~10% for BB or B-rated borrowers. Management refused to enter a price war and was also cautious on recovery processes, so it was not aggressive in the last two quarters.
- Assignment portfolio weakness: The only assignment done was a ~Rs 400 crore gold loan at quarter-end; previous assignments are showing weakness with NPAs that have been provided for, and the bank is not keen on large-scale direct assignments for now.
- Non-gold NPA composition: Gross NPA excluding gold (2.09%) is mainly SME (comparatively large NPAs) and retail (LAP and home loans). NRI home loan borrowers lost jobs and returned from abroad during COVID; SARFAESI actions were stalled by court orders but are now back to normalcy.
- Two-wheeler progress: The two-wheeler loan business, started about two years back, is progressing well with processes and NACH mandates now working smoothly; the bank plans to launch the vertical in new locations.
Rajendran: "We do not get into a price war in the market. We go by our own pricing methodology."
Branch & Product Expansion: Selective and Slow
- Geographic reset: Southern states (Tamil Nadu, Andhra, Telangana) are performing well; Karnataka is slowly picking up; Maharashtra and the North are not progressing as expected. Future branch openings are confined to the three strong southern markets.
- New product pipeline: An MSME product has been launched and board approval is in place for another three to four products in MSME and retail, primarily in Agri and SME segments with straight-through processes. These will launch over the next one to two months but are small-value products that will take time to build volume.
- Gold BC model: A business correspondent model for gold loans is being developed, with the product ready for launch in the second half of the current quarter; management expects some traction, supported by busy-season demand.
- Home loan strategy: The tie-up with HDFC Limited is a training and defensive mechanism, not a portfolio-building exercise; the bank will only consider launching its own home loan at scale once its retail product suite is broad enough to make cross-selling effective.
Guidance & Commitments
| Commitment | Specifics | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| GNPA target | Below 2% gross NPA, below 1% net NPA | March 2022 |
| Gold NPA recovery | Substantial portion of remaining ~Rs 300 crore recovered in Q3, remainder in Q4 | Q3 and Q4 FY22 |
| FY22 loan growth | 10% to 15% (down from original 25% target) | FY22 |
| 25% growth trajectory | Resume 25% annual growth | From FY23 onwards |
| Provision coverage ratio | Reach 80% including write-offs | By end of FY22 |
| Branch expansion | Open another 50+ branches | Current quarter (Q3 FY22) |
| Cost-to-income ratio | Bring below 50%, eventually to 40% | Below 50% near-term; 40% over a period |
| COVID provisions | Reverse all COVID provisions if no third wave | Conditional on COVID fears receding |
Key Metrics
| Metric | Q2 FY22 |
|---|---|
| Net profit | ₹118.57 cr, up 95% QoQ and 72% YoY |
| Net Interest Income (NII) | +21% YoY, +4% QoQ |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 5.22%, vs 5.04% in Q1FY22 and 4.49% in Q2FY21 |
| Operating profit | +26% YoY, -15% QoQ; ₹181.2 cr before regulatory format changes vs ₹179.8 cr in Q1FY22 |
| Cost-to-income ratio | 55.83%, vs 56.41% in Q2FY21 and 48.45% in Q1FY22; would have been 51% under old accounting method |
| Return on assets (RoA) | 2.02% for the quarter, 1.53% for H1FY22 |
| Return on equity (RoE) | 22.96% for the quarter, 17.84% for H1FY22 |
| Gross NPA ratio | 4.11%, down from 4.88% in Q1FY22 |
| Net NPA ratio | 2.63%, down from 3.21% in Q1FY22 |
| Provision coverage ratio (PCR) | 73%, improved from 70% in Q1FY22 |
| Gross NPA ratio excluding gold | 2.09% |
| Net NPA ratio excluding gold | 1.14% |
| Capital adequacy ratio (CRAR) | 20.12%, vs 21.63% in Q1FY22 and 19.69% in Q2FY21 |
| Deposits growth | +9% YoY, +2% QoQ |
| CASA growth | +21% YoY |
| Net advances growth | +12% YoY, +2% QoQ |
| Gold loan growth | +10% YoY, -3% QoQ |
| Collection efficiency | 93% in September 2021 |
| Total restructured book | ₹113.45 cr, 0.79% of gross advances |
| SMA (borrower-wise) | ₹269 cr, 1.88% of gross advances, down from ₹400 cr in Q1FY22 |
| Gold loan yield | 13.08%, up from 11.46% in Q1FY22 |
| Cost of deposits | 4.30%, down from 4.48% in Q1FY22 |
| Gold loan NPAs | ₹287 cr, down from ₹353 cr in Q1FY22 |
| Total gold loan recovery during quarter | ₹236 cr |
| Buffer provisions over RBI requirement | ₹318 cr |
| Liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) | 170% |
| Total branch network | 542, 36 new branches opened in FY22, 6 merged |
| CASA ratio | 33% |
| Leverage ratio | 8.03% |