Key Takeaways
- NIM stabilized, but rate-cut risk looms: NIM held at 3.28%, down just 1 bps QoQ, but management warns that any further repo cuts will hurt because the ability to offset via savings account rate reductions is now largely exhausted.
- Operating leverage finally turned positive: For the first time in four years, operating income grew faster than operating expense, with cost to average assets at 2.54% for the quarter and employee headcount declining in absolute terms over the year.
- Asset quality improved despite MFI stress: Gross NPA fell to 2.99% from 3.28% at the start of the year, slippage ratios hit a five-quarter low, and the recovery-to-slippage ratio reached 83%, all while the bank took accelerated provisions on its small MFI portfolio.
- Fee income hit a record high: Core fee income reached a never-before ₹161 crores for the quarter, with full-year fee income at ₹751 crores, driven by structural shifts including the move from penal interest to penal charges and greater customer engagement.
- What to watch next quarter: Whether the Q2 capital raise proceeds as planned, the pace of NII growth convergence with advances growth, and any further deterioration in the MFI portfolio.
Margin Defense & NIM Outlook
- NIM held steady through active management: The bank cut its savings account rate to 1.50% for balances up to ₹1 lakh around the time of the February repo cut, making it possibly the lowest SA rate offering by any bank. Bulk deposit rates have also been cut "fairly to the bone."
- Retail deposit repricing is a slow burn: Any cuts to retail term deposit rates today will take 12 to 15 months to flow through as the book matures and rebooks, limiting near-term cost-of-funds relief.
- Product mix shift toward higher yields: The bank has been consistently tilting incremental sourcing from home loans toward LAP and business loans over the last five quarters, and results are now visible in the portfolio.
- Co-lending growth is being deliberately slowed: After growing 100% in the prior year, co-lending growth will now be capped to match balance sheet growth, because while it is cost-accretive, it is not great for NIM. Organic products carry higher yields and will drive incremental growth.
- Rate-cut vulnerability is explicit: The bank has already immunized what it can on the savings account side; any further repo cuts will directly compress margins with limited offsetting levers left.
Kutty: "If more rate cuts were to happen, our ability to pass on that by reducing the savings account, etc will be limited. So as of now, its okay. But any future rate cuts, the ability to reduce instantaneously the cost of fund by reducing the savings account rates, that option would be limited for us."
Operating Leverage & Cost Control
- Jaws widened for the first time in four years: Operating income growth rate exceeded operating expense growth rate, a milestone the bank has been working toward through headcount reduction and productivity improvements.
- Headcount fell in absolute terms: The number of employees was reduced during the year, driven by faster failure on initiatives, RPA deployment, and technology improvements. Some increase is expected in the current year, but it will stay below the prior-year peak.
- Cost-to-average-assets trending toward target: The quarter came in at 2.54%, against a go-to target of 2.5%. Q1 is typically the nadir, and the trend over the next quarter will indicate whether the target is within reach.
- Technology spend is structural and ongoing: Investments span customer-facing technology (paperless account opening, digital MFI lending end-to-end), backend systems (three of four core banking systems upgraded), and cybersecurity (SIEM upgraded last year). RPA usage has already reduced manpower needs.
Kutty: "Is the best yet to come? Of course. Do you have the people skills to leverage it? Without a doubt."
Asset Quality & Credit Discipline
- Gross NPA improved through the year: GNPA fell to 2.99% from 3.28% at the start of FY25, with no write-offs during the quarter. Net NPA at 1.12% was just one bps higher than the start of the year, despite inclement weather in unsecured lending and microfinance loans.
- Slippage and recovery trends are favorable: Q4 slippage ratios were the lowest in five quarters, and the recovery-to-slippage ratio reached 83%. Provision cost for the quarter was ~33 bps, within the bank's model range of 45-55 bps, even after accelerated MFI provisions.
- MFI portfolio remains a small, stressed pocket: No improvement has been seen, and the bank has taken accelerated provisions. The portfolio is small enough that it does not threaten the overall credit story.
- Credit conservatism is non-negotiable: Management explicitly stated it will not dilute credit quality for NIM or any other objective, calling conservatism the hallmark of a bank. Over 50% of loans won and lost to balance transfers involve NBFCs and Small Finance Banks, not mainstream private banks.
Kutty: "We are conservative. We are proud to be conservative. We really believe that the hallmark of a bank is the ability to manage its portfolio health. So that's a very clear answer. Right. So we don't expect us to dilute credit quality for anything, including NIM. That's not going to happen."
Fee Income & Revenue Diversification
- Core fee income hit an all-time high: ₹161 crores for Q4, eclipsing the previous quarter's record. Full-year fee income reached ₹751 crores. Q4 is seasonally strong for third-party distribution, but management says the momentum is structural and Q1 will be better than the prior-year Q1.
- Penal charges regime is a structural tailwind: The shift from penal interest (accrued, not collected) to penal charges (collected before recognition) means fee income now reflects actual cash collections, creating a more sustainable base even if the absolute quantum is slightly lower than the old accrued interest.
- Overdraft strategy is scaling: The bank is "going hard" on overdraft accounts for small and medium business owners' deficit needs, and expects to continue at similar growth rates over the next few quarters, possibly years.
- Treasury gains are acknowledged as cyclical: Management flagged that treasury gains partly reflect the rate-cut environment and emphasized that core fee income growth over five quarters is the trend investors should track, not treasury windfalls.
Kutty: "We haven't even scratched the surface on this, Suraj. I really think there is more to come."
Growth Strategy & Product Mix
- PMAY 2.0 is a major growth vector: Final guidelines arrived during the quarter, and management is very happy with the terms: 11.5% maximum interest rate (near current yields), five-year minimum customer tenure, high incentive for borrowers to remain current, and a ₹25 lakh loan size that sits in the bank's sweet spot. The bank will promote it aggressively as an integral part of growth for years.
- Organic growth is being prioritized over co-lending: Co-lending served as a petri dish for experimentation in new segments and geographies, but going forward it will grow only in line with the balance sheet. Organic products carry higher yields and will come from existing people, enhanced technology, and improved productivity with marginal cost impact.
- No unsecured lending appetite: Management was emphatic that the bank will not enter unsecured lending or higher-yield products outside its secured-asset framework, even if NIM pressure intensifies.
- Advances growth outpaced liabilities for two straight quarters: Management is "not particularly happy" with this pattern and stated it is not the way the bank will grow; the trend line is not heading in that direction. The bank opportunistically funded 24.7% advances growth with higher-cost deposits, which pushed up cost of deposits despite the SA rate cut.
Kutty: "I am not particularly happy with two consecutive quarters where the advances growth has been higher than the liabilities growth. That's not the way we want to run this bank."
Capital & ROA Pathway
- Capital raise targeted for Q2 FY26: Paperwork activity has been completed, and management is looking at Q2 for the incremental money to come in. The bank wants a few more consistent good quarters before going to market, aiming for a valuation more reflective of its intrinsic strength.
- ROA is being built through three levers beyond NIM: Fee income to average assets (1.18% for the quarter, 1.09% for the year) is running above projections. Provision cost to average assets (~33 bps for the quarter) is below the model's 45-55 bps range. Cost to average assets (2.54%) is approaching the 2.5% target. Management argues these three levers are compensating for NIM pressure on the path to 1% ROA.
- NII growth convergence remains un-timed: NII growth dropped from 15% to 10% this quarter, trailing advances growth. Management attributed part of the gap to rate cuts and said convergence will take more time, but declined to provide a specific timeline.
Kutty: "Would you want to raise capital? Yes, at some point in time, you have to raise capital. Would you want to raise it at this particular level? Perhaps not. We have three consecutive good quarters under our belt. Maybe we will have a few more consistent good quarters under the belt when we go to the market."
Guidance & Commitments
| Commitment | Specifics | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| NIM | Hold at current level (~3.28%); any further repo cuts will hurt | Ongoing; vulnerable to rate cycle |
| Co-lending growth | Grow in line with balance sheet growth (doubling in ~3.5 years), down from 100% prior-year growth | FY26 |
| Cost-to-average-assets | Reach ~2.5% | Trend over next quarter (Q1 FY26) will indicate |
| Capital raise | Incremental money to come in | Q2 FY26 |
| Employee headcount | Some increase, but stay below prior-year peak | FY26 |
| Provision cost | Model sustains 45-55 bps | Ongoing structural range |
| Credit quality | No dilution for NIM or any other objective | Ongoing |
| PMAY 2.0 | Integral part of growth plan | Next foreseeable number of years |
| Organic vs inorganic growth | Organic book to contribute significantly more than it has been | FY26 and beyond |
Key Metrics
| Metric | Q4 FY25 |
|---|---|
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 3.29%, down 1 bps QoQ from 3.30%; stabilized after declining trend |
| Net Interest Income growth | 10% YoY, down from 15% in Q3 FY25 |
| Advances growth | 24.7% YoY |
| Deposit growth | 22% YoY |
| Balance sheet growth | 22% YoY |
| Profit after tax | Not stated |
| Return on assets | Not stated |
| Gross NPA | 2.99%, improved from 3.28% at start of year |
| Net NPA | 1.12%, up 1 bps from start of year |
| Provision Coverage Ratio | 74.48% |
| Credit cost | 33 bps for the quarter; 31 bps for the full year |
| Recovery to fresh slippage ratio | 83% for Q4 |
| Core fee income | ₹161 cr, never-before high, up from ₹141 cr in Q3 |
| Fee to average assets | 1.18% for the quarter; 1.09% for the full year |
| Cost to average assets | 2.54% for the quarter |
| CRAR (Tier 1) | 14.3% |
| Total capital adequacy | 16.77% |
| CD ratio | 85% |
| Savings account growth | 19% YoY |
| Top 20 depositor concentration | 6.61%, declined over the quarter |
| Co-lending book | ~₹7,000 cr, roughly 100% growth YoY |
| Employee count | 11,057 at year-end, lower than maximum during the year |
| Employee expenses | ₹232 cr in Q4, vs ₹231 cr in Q3 and ₹235 cr in Q2 |
| Yield on advances | 11.54% |