Key Takeaways
- MDF margins compressed by mix and cost: MDF EBITDA margin fell to 19.6% as the OEM segment (29% of domestic volume) and higher wood and brand costs weighed on profitability.
- Plywood division in deliberate reset: Volumes dropped 22.6% and margins turned negative as the company restructured its sales team and dealer network, a disruption management frames as necessary for long-term recovery.
- BIS implementation is the pivotal catalyst: Management is certain the regulation will be enforced, forcing foreign producers to install new compliance infrastructure, which should curtail imports and benefit domestic players.
- Volume and margin bottom called: Management believes both volumes and margins have bottomed out, with domestic volume growth expected to improve quarter-by-quarter starting Q4.
- What to watch next quarter: Whether the plywood restructuring translates into volume recovery, the pace of MDF domestic volume growth toward the 15% FY25 target, and any concrete BIS enforcement timeline.
MDF Business: Mix Shift & Margin Pressure
- OEM segment drove the mix shift: A new lower-density OEM product contributed 28,025 cubic meters and Rs.62.65 crore in value, pushing OEM to nearly 29% of domestic volume, which management says is the peak and will only decline from here.
- Realization decline is purely mix-driven: The 3.5% sequential drop in domestic realizations came entirely from product mix change, not competitive price cuts; management stated prices have remained at the same level.
- OEM margin mechanics: Margins in the OEM segment are slightly lower than industrial grade, but the benefit comes from higher cubic-meter throughput at lower density, which spreads fixed overheads across more volume when the plant runs at optimal utilization.
- Brand spend stepped up sharply: Brand spends rose to 2.2% of sales from 1% YoY, adding to the margin pressure alongside higher wood prices and increased domestic competition.
- Commercial grade product launched: A new product one quality tier below industrial grade has been introduced to compete directly with the imported segment, offering cost savings due to lower density comparable to imported material.
Shobhan Mittal: "…when we produce a lower density product, our volumes in terms of production increases. So, the day we are reaching optimal capacity utilizations, that's where we would really start seeing the benefit because the savings come in the form of fixed overheads, because we produce much higher amount of cubic meters in the same amount of time as opposed to the higher density and the higher grade products."
Plywood: Restructuring Overhang
- Volumes and margins collapsed: Plywood volumes fell 22.6% and operating margins turned negative at 4.1%, hit by lower volumes, higher raw material costs, and a 13.8% drop in realizations driven by lower decorative veneers volumes.
- Restructuring is the root cause: The poor performance is primarily due to a complete restructuring and refurbishment of the business model, including weeding out dealers who transact only once every 4-5 months and shifting to a concentrated distribution model with monthly stock-holding dealers.
- Manpower changes were planned: Attrition at the top level is described as planned restructuring where the company chose to replace or reassign people, not unplanned departures.
- Decorative veneers exited: The company has now fully exited the decorative veneers business, which contributed to the lower realizations and volumes.
- Recovery target set: Management aims to recover market share and reach optimum capacity in the next few quarters, targeting FY23 plywood volumes of 78 lakh square meters in FY25.
- Long-term commitment reaffirmed: Management sees plywood as a durable business in India with high revenue-to-investment ratio and distribution network leverage across two products, with no plans to exit.
Shobhan Mittal: "We are very much optimistic that we should be present in this particular business because plywood in India is going to remain for the next many, many years to come…we don't have any plans to exit this business, we are very much focused on this business."
BIS Regulation: The Import Catalyst
- Imports dipped in Q3: MDF imports fell to approximately 93,000 cubic meters from 1,44,000 cubic meters in Q2, possibly due to inventory buildup ahead of BIS implementation.
- BIS enforcement is certain: Management is unequivocal that BIS will be implemented, describing the process for foreign producers as tedious, requiring new printers and machinery for individual board printing with the BIS stamp, and infrastructure that many currently lack.
- Import curtailment expected: While management will not say imports will return to pre-COVID lows, they are confident BIS will definitely help curtail imports, and the company will actively push for enforcement as a domestic producer.
- Plywood BIS to follow with a lag: BIS implementation on plywood will possibly happen with a time lag, and over time a large part of the unorganized plywood segment will be subsumed by MDF primarily due to BIS compliance issues.
- Import pricing dynamics: Management noted that foreign producers may be running plants at breakeven or very low margins and effectively dumping material, a dynamic BIS should disrupt.
Shobhan Mittal: "A lot of these companies do not even have the facilities to do individual board printing like we do in India. So even on that aspect, they will have to do the compliance, install new printers and machinery, infrastructure needs to be created for that."
Exports: A Residual, Not a Strategy
- Exports are a capacity-utilization valve: Management stated plainly that if the entire capacity could be sold domestically, exports would be zero; exports are done only when realizations exceed variable expenses, making a positive contribution to fixed cost.
- Export EBITDA is negative: The company is currently not making positive EBITDA on exports, and reduced shipments to large buyers due to higher raw material costs while continuing with smaller buyers where realizations are better.
- Export realizations track import parity: Export realizations are similar to what imported products cost in India, meaning the company competes in export markets by matching those prices.
- Preferred mix is 90:10 domestic to export: Management targets a 90:10 domestic-to-export mix, reinforcing that exports are a residual channel.
- Marginal Q4 improvement possible: Export realizations could see a marginal increase in Q4, with no possibility of reduction.
V. Venkatramani: "If we could sell the entire capacity in the domestic market, we won't be doing any exports at all, exports would be zero."
Capacity, Costs & Expansion
- MDF expansion on track for late FY25: Work is progressing on the new MDF capacity, with Rs.115 crore paid from internal accruals and Rs.146 crore from borrowings till date; commercial production is estimated in Q3 FY25, subject to Red Sea issue resolution and equipment shipment from Germany.
- Wood prices to stay elevated through FY25: Management does not expect any significant reduction in wood prices during Q4 or the next financial year, with reductions possibly starting only from FY26 when plantations from FY22 begin yielding timber.
- Capacity utilization target of 85-90% in FY25: The company is targeting between 85% and 90% capacity utilization for the next financial year, with the South plant specifically targeted to reach optimum utilization in FY25.
- Inventory discipline maintained: Production of 3,62,000 cubic meters versus sales of 3,57,000 cubic meters over 9M FY24 resulted in only a ~5,000 cubic meter inventory increase; the company actively manages run schedules, sometimes preponing maintenance or shutting down components to avoid buildup.
- End-of-year schemes launched: In the current running quarter, the company launched end-of-year schemes to keep or grow market share, acknowledging that certain pricing pressures will persist going forward.
V. Venkatramani: "We are not expecting any significant reduction in wood prices during Q4 or even the next financial year, I think they would possibly start reducing from FY'26 only."
Guidance & Commitments
| Commitment | Specifics | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| MDF expansion commercial production | New capacity begins commercial production | Q3 FY25, subject to Red Sea resolution and German shipment |
| MDF domestic volume growth | 15% domestic volume growth in MDF | FY25 |
| Overall capacity utilization | 85-90% capacity utilization | FY25 |
| South plant utilization | Optimum capacity utilization at South plant | FY25 |
| Plywood volume recovery | Achieve FY23 volumes of 78 lakh square meters (ex-decorative veneers) | FY25 |
| Wood price reduction | Timber prices to start reducing as FY22 plantations yield | FY26 or possibly a couple of months earlier |
| OEM segment mix | OEM contribution to domestic volume (currently ~29%) will only go down from here | No specific target; mix varies with capacity utilization |
Key Metrics
| Metric | Q3 FY24 |
|---|---|
| Net sales | ₹384.99 cr, down 8.1% YoY from ₹419.09 cr |
| MDF sales | ₹346.62 cr, down 4.1% YoY, contributed 90% of top line |
| Plywood sales | ₹38.37 cr, down 33.3% YoY |
| Gross margin | 56.1%, down 212 bps YoY |
| EBITDA margin | 17.3%, down 577 bps YoY |
| EBITDA | ₹66.42 cr |
| PAT | ₹34.6 cr, down from ₹37.5 cr in Q3 FY23 |
| MDF domestic volumes | 4% YoY growth; overall MDF volumes flat at 118,301 CBM |
| MDF domestic realization | ₹31,593 per CBM, down 6.7% YoY |
| MDF export realization | ₹19,053 per CBM, up 2.2% YoY |
| MDF blended capacity utilization | 74% (Uttarakhand 82%, AP 70%) |
| Plywood volumes | 0.15 cr sq m, down 22.6% YoY; capacity utilization at 58% |
| Plywood realization | ₹249 per sq m, down 13.8% YoY; excluding decorative veneers up 0.7% at ₹248 per sq m |
| Net debt | Negative ₹176 cr as on 31 Dec 2023, vs negative ₹145 cr YoY |
| Net working capital | 25 days, up 2 days YoY |
| MDF expansion capex incurred in Q3 | ₹24 cr from internal accruals; cumulative ₹115 cr till date |
| OEM segment volume | 28,025 CBM, at average realization of ₹22,355 per CBM; ~29% of domestic volume |
| Brand spends | 2.2% of sales, vs 1.0% in Q3 FY23 |
| Currency loss | ₹8.44 cr |
| Timber price – North plant | ₹5.71 per Kg, up 6% YoY and 2% QoQ |
| Timber price – South plant | ₹4.44 per Kg, up 40% YoY and 4% QoQ |