Global Surfaces Ltd Forensic Report - SOIC x StockScans Report

as of Sep 2026

Global Surfaces' FY2025-26 record carries a clean audit opinion, but that opinion sits alongside a web of related-party exposure, recurring audit exceptions, and tax disputes. The most serious issue is a ₹102.81 crore loan to a loss-making Dubai subsidiary being converted into equity at a premium, deepening the parent's stake in an entity whose liabilities exceed its assets. Four years of clean opinions coexist with repeated CARO exceptions, and the income-tax department has been active against the company since a December 2020 search.

Key findings

  1. A ₹102.81 crore loan to a loss-making Dubai subsidiary is being converted to equity at a premium Critical - Global Surfaces approved converting a USD 11.12 million unsecured loan, equivalent to ₹100 crore as on December 31, 2025, to wholly owned subsidiary Global Surfaces FZE into equity at AED 700 per share, pending JAFZA approvals as at March 31, 2026. The subsidiary reported cumulative losses of ₹75 crore and negative net worth of ₹8.18 crore as at March 31, 2025, which turned positive only after the conversion. Its UAE segment liabilities of ₹463.54 crore exceeded assets of ₹414.84 crore, and interest on the loan was extended to March 31, 2027 with no repayment terms.
  2. Four straight years of clean audit opinions coexist with recurring CARO exceptions Major - Statutory auditor Ummed Jain & Co. issued an unqualified opinion for FY2025-26. However, CARO reported bank-return mismatches in all four years from FY2022-23 to FY2025-26, subsidiary advances without repayment terms in each of those years, and a database-level audit trail gap for three consecutive years. A packing credit of ₹1.19 crore was repaid 18 days late, and the company incurred a cash loss of ₹2.11 crore in FY2025-26.
  3. Global Surfaces' reported borrowings understate its economic obligations Major - The parent has pledged its property, plant, equipment and current assets, and given guarantees, to secure Global Surfaces FZE's Dubai project facilities. FZE's HDFC Bank term loans include bullet repayments of ₹87.57 crore and ₹21.57 crore. Bank stock statements have shown material discrepancies in inventory, receivables and payables for four consecutive years, and on September 1, 2026 Acuité downgraded Cash Credit, Proposed Long Term Loan and Secured Overdraft facilities to ACUITE BBB | Negative, while downgrading Bank Guarantee, Letter of Credit, PC/PCFC and Stand By Line of Credit facilities to ACUITE A3+.
  4. Statutory auditor B. Khosla & Co. resigned mid-tenure in November 2025 Major - B. Khosla & Co., re-appointed in September 2023 for a five-year term, resigned effective November 13, 2025, with the Board recording no concerns raised. Ummed Jain & Co. was appointed to fill the casual vacancy on December 8, 2025. The outgoing auditor's communication was considered with no issues requiring attention.
  5. Promoter family holds 73.25% and controls both executive roles Major - Mayank Shah served as Chairman, MD and CFO from October 17, 2025 to August 10, 2026, drawing ₹3.83 crore in remuneration from subsidiary Global Surfaces FZE. A ₹49.61 crore forfeiture from 95,00,000 lapsed warrants, including promoter allotments, was booked to capital reserve. Promoter shareholding stands at 73.25% with zero pledge.
  6. Losses are being shaped by accounting choices Major - A ₹5 crore MAT credit was written off, the Bagru unit was discontinued effective March 31, 2026, and ₹49.88 crore in forfeited warrant proceeds went to reserves. Consolidated PAT was ₹-31.21 crore against standalone PAT of ₹9.15 crore, placing 129% of losses at subsidiaries. Interest coverage was -0.5x in the latest year.
  7. Revenue is concentrated in few customers and US market Minor - Customers accounting for 10% or more of revenue exist in both FY2025-26 and FY2024-25, and the group cannot determine the impact of US tariffs on sales. Receivable days improved from 224 in FY25 to 151 in FY26. Revenue declined from ₹233 crore in FY26 to ₹224 crore in the latest year, while PAT moved from ₹24.23 crore in FY23 to ₹19.78 crore in FY24, then to losses in subsequent years.

What to watch

Bottom line: This is a disclosed and audited record, but the disclosures themselves carry the risk. The core issue is the Dubai subsidiary: the parent's assets secure its debt, its losses are funded by a loan being converted into equity, and its interest payments are being deferred. The recurring CARO exceptions and the auditor resignation point to control weaknesses, while the tax disputes involve penalties and demands that the company believes will not have a material adverse impact. Watch the conversion completion and the subsidiary's repayment schedule, and monitor the company's stated intention to file appeals.