IVP Ltd Forensic Report - SOIC x StockScans Report

as of Jul 2026

IVP Ltd’s record carries an unbroken chain of unqualified audit opinions, yet three major findings cut through that comfort. A ₹92.59 crore disputed rent claim from Mumbai Port Trust, now accompanied by a fresh eviction order for ₹56.84 crore stayed only weeks ago, dwarfs annual profit. And the resignation of a Big Four auditor over fees, followed by the appointment of a smaller firm at a materially lower cost now proposed for a second term through 2031, is a classic governance flag.

Key findings

  1. Mumbai Port Trust’s disputed rent claim has escalated to ₹92.59 crore Major - The contingent liability for the Mumbai Port Trust demand, which is contrary to a 2004 Supreme Court order, stood at ₹92.59 crore as at March 31, 2026, comprising rent of ₹71.23 crore and interest of ₹21.36 crore. The FY21 Annual Report disclosed that a demand of ₹40.59 crore, including rent of ₹19.92 crore, was received during that year. On 7 July 2026, the City Civil Court, Mumbai stayed an eviction order for ₹56.84 crore that had been received on or around 11 June 2026.
  2. B S R & Associates resigned in November 2020 citing inadequate audit fees and was replaced by a smaller firm at a lower fee Major - M/s. B S R & Associates LLP resigned on 3 November 2020, stating “the current audit fee was not commensurate with the cost/ efforts involved in carrying out the audit,” leaving three years of a five-year term unserved. The company appointed M/s. Rajendra & Co. on 9 November 2020 at a fee of ₹9 Lakhs per annum, a sum the company itself described as a “material change” from the fee paid to the previous auditor. Shareholder approval is now sought for a second consecutive five-year term through 2031, with the proposed fee for FY2026-27 set at ₹13 Lakhs.

What to watch

Bottom line: This is a disclosed record with an unbroken audit trail, but the comfort stops at three points. The employee fraud is a realised control failure, not a hypothetical one. The Mumbai Port Trust claim, now with an eviction order stayed only on 7 July 2026, is a material uncertainty that multiples of annual profit cannot absorb. And the auditor churn, a Big Four resignation over fees followed by a materially cheaper replacement now seeking a second decade-long term, is a governance signal that warrants scrutiny. Watch the court rulings and the auditor vote.