Key Takeaways
- Volume tells the real story: Revenue grew 14% YoY but volume jumped 22%, masked by lower copper and aluminium prices; the company consumed 22% more raw material in the quarter.
- Capacity, not demand, is the bottleneck: Management confirmed the company could have grown 25–30% if capacity were available, with LT/HT utilisation at ~90% and EHV near full.
- Exports have structurally re-rated: Export contribution leapt to 17% of sales from ~10% historically, with USA shipments starting in February and a strong international order book driven partly by China+1 diversification.
- Margins held despite a one-off hit: EBITDA margin stayed in the 10.5–11% band; the cable segment EBIT dip was entirely due to ₹10–₹12 crores of IPL and advertisement spend booked in Q1 that was absent in the prior-year quarter.
- What to watch next quarter: Whether EHV cable sales recover to the promised ₹100–₹125 crores per quarter, the pace of Silvassa brownfield capacity coming online, and any further export mix shift.
The Capacity-Led Growth Story
- Volume growth outstripped revenue growth: 22% more raw material was consumed YoY, but falling copper and aluminium prices compressed the revenue line to 14% growth, so the underlying demand signal is stronger than the topline suggests.
- Capacity is the binding constraint: LT/HT cable plants are running at ~90% utilisation and EHV at near-full utilisation; management stated the company grew slower than peers solely because of this constraint, not because of any demand weakness.
- Peer comparison acknowledged: An analyst noted peer cable businesses grew ~25–40% while KEI lagged; management attributed the gap entirely to capacity limits and did not provide market share data or comment on whether share was lost.
- Brownfield relief is imminent: Silvassa expansion (₹45 crores) completes by September 2023, adding ~₹500 crores of annual topline capacity in the second half; Bhiwadi (₹110 crores) finishes by Q1 of next financial year, supporting the targeted 17% growth.
- Greenfield unlocks the outer years: Gujarat greenfield (₹250–₹300 crores, land purchased in Q1) begins commercial production in Q4 FY25, part of a ₹300–₹350 crore annual capex plan to sustain 15–16% CAGR.
Anil Gupta: "Yes, yes, you are right. Demand environment is strong and it is only the capacity constraint due to which we have grown lesser."
Export Transformation
- Export share jumped structurally: Exports rose to 17% of sales from ~10% in prior years, with the CMD raising the contribution target from 10% to 17% for the current year and aiming for 20% within 2–3 years.
- USA entry is live: Exports to the United States commenced in February this year, and the company is receiving significant inquiries from international clients looking to diversify away from China under the China+1 theme.
- Product scope is broadening: KEI is now exporting LT, HT, and a small quantity of EHV cable; the export order book is described as strong across these categories.
- Country-level detail withheld: Management declined to disclose the percentage of exports going to the US market or any other country-wise breakdown.
EHV Cable: A Q1 Dip, Not a Trend
- EHV sales halved in Q1: Revenue fell to ₹50 crores from ₹100 crores in the prior-year quarter due to order execution delays, not order book weakness.
- Recovery is promised from Q2: Management expects EHV sales to rebound to ₹100–₹125 crores per quarter starting Q2, and stated that growth from this quarter onward will cover the first-quarter deficit.
- Order book provides visibility: The EHV order book is described as very strong, giving confidence in the recovery trajectory.
Margins: One-Off Noise, Steady Underlying
- Cable segment EBIT dipped on a discrete item: The Y-o-Y and Q-o-Q contraction was driven entirely by ₹10–₹12 crores of advertisement and IPL expenditure booked in Q1, which was not incurred in the same quarter last year.
- Consolidated EBITDA margin held its range: At 10.5–11%, margins were stable; management expects the same range for the current year and next, before expansion begins.
- The expansion roadmap is quantified: Management targets a 1–1.5% EBITDA margin expansion over the next 2–3 years, reaching 12% in FY25–26 and 12.5% in FY26–27, driven by operating leverage from greenfield capacity and narrowing the house wire price gap versus peers.
- Channel margin differential is modest: Retail (dealer/distributor) margins are close to 11%, institutional sales margins are close to 10–10.5%; house wire margin at 11% trails peers at 14–15%, and closing that gap is a stated expansion lever.
Rajeev Gupta: "Sir, we are not competing with anybody, we are competing only with ourselves. As we said, our margin in 25-26, 26-27 will reach to 12.5%."
Balance Sheet & Working Capital
- Debt-free milestone reached: The company has repaid all its debts and is now debt-free; management intends to maintain a debt-free balance sheet going forward.
- Credit ratings affirmed with positive bias: India Ratings affirmed a long-term rating of AA with a positive outlook; ICRA and CARE rate the company AA stable, with A1+ short-term ratings across all three agencies.
- Working capital swung on creditor payments: Net working capital increased by ~₹250 crores Q-o-Q and operating cash flow was negative, driven by a ~₹160 crore reduction in creditors as the company chose to pay cash for raw materials rather than use letters of credit, avoiding interest costs.
- Receivables are improving: Debtors are decreasing even as sales grew 14%, partly due to retention money received on closed EPC projects; management expects receivables to hold at ~2.2 months, helped by the rising mix of house wire retail distribution (now 46–47% of business).
- No quantified savings from creditor reduction: When asked about savings from the ₹160 crore creditor paydown, management noted that avoiding LCs is non-interest-bearing but did not quantify the benefit.
Strategic Posture
- FMEG entry ruled out: Management stated unequivocally that the company has no plans to enter the FMEG business.
- In-house manufacturing is non-negotiable: To maintain quality, KEI does not outsource production for incremental growth, even when capacity is tight.
- Segment mix is shifting toward retail and exports: Institutional business (LT/HT power cable) now contributes 30%, dealer/distributor 45%, and exports 17%.
- Transparency is a stated management principle: Management emphasised that it communicates openly with investors and bankers to avoid surprises on either the negative or positive side.
Rajeev Gupta: "Sir, we are very, very transparent with all of our investors, all our bankers that whatever we are doing, we are communicating. So, there is a no surprises in the negative side or positive side."
Guidance & Commitments
| Commitment | Specifics | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 16–17% in the current financial year | FY24 |
| Silvassa brownfield completion | ₹45 crores capex; adds ~₹500 crores annual topline capacity | September 2023 |
| Bhiwadi brownfield completion | ~₹110 crores capex; supports next year's 17% growth | Q1 FY25 |
| Gujarat greenfield first phase | ₹250–₹300 crores capex; commercial production begins | Q4 FY25 |
| Annual capex run-rate | ₹300–₹350 crores each year to sustain 15–16% CAGR | Next 3 years |
| EHV sales recovery | ₹100–₹125 crores per quarter | From Q2 FY24 onward |
| Export contribution | 17% of sales in current year; 20% within 2–3 years | FY24 / FY26–27 |
| EBITDA margin trajectory | 11% range for current and next year; 12% in FY25–26; 12.5% in FY26–27 | FY24 through FY27 |
| Receivables | Holding close to 2.2 months | Ongoing |
| Debt-free status | Maintain debt-free balance sheet | Ongoing |
| Long-term growth CAGR | 16–17% for the next 10 years | 10-year horizon |
Key Metrics
| Metric | Q1 FY24 |
|---|---|
| Net sales | ₹1,782.5 cr, +13.87% YoY |
| EBITDA | ₹186.6 cr, +13.27% YoY |
| EBITDA margin | 10.47%, vs 10.42% in Q1 FY23 |
| Profit after tax | ₹121.39 cr, +17% YoY |
| PAT margin | 6.81% |
| Volume growth (cable division) | 22% YoY, based on raw material consumption |
| Revenue growth guidance (FY24) | 16–17% |
| B2C (distribution network) sales | ₹796 cr, +22% YoY; 45% of total sales vs 42% last year |
| Domestic institutional cable sales (wires & cables) | ₹538 cr, +14% YoY |
| Domestic institutional EHV cable sales | ₹50 cr, vs ₹100 cr in Q1 FY23 |
| Export sales | ₹307 cr, +~25% YoY; 17% of total sales vs ~10% in earlier years |
| EPC division sales | ₹111 cr, vs ₹84 cr in Q1 FY23 |
| Stainless Steel Wire division sales | ₹58 cr, vs ₹61 cr in Q1 FY23 |
| Pending order book (as on 26 July) | ₹3,567 cr; EPC ₹832 cr, EHV ₹809 cr, domestic LT/HT ₹1,690 cr, export ₹236 cr |
| Capacity utilisation (LT & power cable) | ~90% |
| Capacity utilisation (EHV cable) | 90–95% expected from Q2 FY24 |
| Net cash | ₹24 cr as on 30 June, vs ₹183 cr as on 31 March |
| Total borrowing | ₹130 cr, channel finance only |
| Finance cost | ₹8.94 cr, vs ₹9.23 cr in Q1 FY23 |
| Capex incurred in Q1 | ~₹114 cr |
| Receivables (debtor days) | 2.4 months in Q1, expected to close FY24 at 2.2 months |
| Book value per equity share | ₹300.86 as on 30 June |
| Advertisement & IPL spend (one-time in Q1) | ~₹10–12 cr, not incurred in Q1 FY23 |