Precision Camshafts Ltd Forensic Report - SOIC x StockScans Report

as of Jul 2026

Precision Camshafts’ record carries cash flow that consistently exceeds profit, but the story is one of a multi-year pattern of subsidiary closures that has shrunk the international footprint. Two things demand attention: an MCA investigation running since December 2021 with no resolution in sight, and a decade-old ₹17.01 crore income-tax demand that remains contested with no provision.

Key findings

  1. An MCA investigation under Section 210 has been open since December 2021 Major - The Ministry of Corporate Affairs initiated an investigation into the affairs of the company under Section 210 of the Companies Act, 2013 on 17 December 2021, and as of the FY26 annual report the investigation remains under process with no interim or final orders received. The company filed a compounding application with the Regional Director on 18 December 2024 under sections 73 and 77 of the 1956 Act and sections 128 and 129 of the 2013 Act, but subsequently withdrew it due to a pending tax matter with the Commissioner of Income Tax. CARE Ratings has consistently flagged the ongoing investigation as a key monitorable from January 2022 through October 2024 while reaffirming long-term rating at CARE A; Stable.
  2. A decade-old ₹17.01 crore income-tax demand remains contested with no provision Minor - The company disclosed an income tax demand of ₹17.01 crore for AY 2014-15 on ESOP expenditure and other disallowances, with ₹3.35 crore paid under protest and an appeal pending before CIT(Appeals) as of 31 March 2026. A GST demand of ₹2.01 crore for FY 2017-18 on tooling income and ITC mismatch is under writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The company states that for all disclosed legal claims, outflow is not probable and no provision has been made.
  3. Low-interest loans to loss-making overseas subsidiaries carry irregular interest payments Minor - The loan to wholly owned subsidiary PCL International Holdings B.V. carries interest at 1.5% to 2% per annum, and during FY26 the Board extended the repayment date from 31 December 2026 to 31 December 2031. The auditor reported that the borrower has not been regular in the payment of interest on loans to subsidiaries in FY20, FY22, FY23, FY24, FY25, and FY26. EMOSS Mobile Systems B.V., a step-down subsidiary, paid management fees of INR 102.77 lakh to Hormiga Management B.V. and ₹95.99 lakh to M.A. Noordam Holding B.V. in the half-year ended 30 September 2022, entities where KMP or relatives of KMP have significant influence.
  4. A multi-year pattern of subsidiary closures has shrunk the international footprint Minor - Step-down subsidiary MFT Motoren und Fahrzeugtechnik GmbH filed for insolvency and a provisional liquidator was appointed on 8 September 2025, resulting in loss of control and deconsolidation from that date. The group had 2 subsidiaries and 2 step-down subsidiaries as of 31 March 2021, declining to 2 subsidiaries and 1 step-down subsidiary as of 31 March 2026. PCL (International) Holding B.V. reported a consolidated net loss of ₹11.49 crore in FY26, following net losses of ₹27.36 crore in FY25 and ₹37.56 crore in FY24.
  5. Standalone revenue collapsed 91% year-on-year, and customer concentration is high Minor - Standalone revenue fell from ₹7,000.27 crore in FY24 to ₹638.27 crore in FY25, a decline of approximately 91%. In FY26, two customers each contributed 10% or more of total consolidated revenue, and two customers contributed approximately ₹197.95 crore to standalone revenue. The company recognised ₹11.95 crore as an exceptional item in FY26 for compensation from two major customers for contract termination and capacity under-utilisation.
  6. Operating cash flow consistently exceeds profit, and a large capex programme is underway Clean - Consolidated CFO exceeded consolidated PAT in each of the last five years: FY26 CFO ₹120 crore vs PAT ₹51 crore, FY25 CFO ₹143 crore vs PAT ₹54 crore, FY24 CFO ₹131 crore vs PAT ₹40 crore, FY23 CFO ₹103 crore vs PAT ₹46 crore, FY22 CFO ₹88 crore vs PAT ₹46 crore. Consolidated PAT was ₹51 crore in FY26 while standalone PAT was only ₹6 crore, meaning 89% of consolidated profit resided in subsidiaries. No CWIP projects were overdue or exceeded original cost as at 31 March 2026.

What to watch

Bottom line: This is a disclosed and audited record where cash generation at the consolidated level is real and a large capex programme is underway with no overdue projects. The risk sits in three places: a European acquisition strategy that has already resulted in subsidiary closures and losses, an MCA investigation open since December 2021 with no outcome, and a pattern of irregular interest payments on loans to loss-making overseas subsidiaries and remuneration excesses, that repeats year after year. Watch the AGM vote on director pay, the MCA orders, and whether EMOSS triggers another impairment.