• Affluence revenue discrepancy: SEBI's findings indicated that Affluence denied executing any trades with the company, despite 11,000 crore rupees of transactions being recorded in company books across a four-year period.
• Reported revenue stance: Rajesh Mehta maintained that all revenue figures from buyers such as Affluence and Walcam are completely accurate and properly accounted for, with no rationale to overstate revenue.
• Personal account transactions: The anchor questioned findings that trades and fund transfers were executed through Mehta's personal account at net losses, while Mehta asserted that complete factual details and documents have been provided to the regulator.
• Interim order response: The company stated that detailed client breakdowns and backup documentation have been submitted to SEBI to resolve doubts raised in its ongoing investigation and interim order.