S & S Power Switchgear Ltd Forensic Report - SOIC x StockScans Report

as of Sep 2026

S & S Power Switchgear's audit record is clean on its face: unqualified opinions from CNK Associates for FY2025-26, both standalone and consolidated. But the record carries recurring red flags: the parent books a deferred tax asset against a loss history, the auditor repeatedly leans on promoter support for the going-concern assumption, and solvency rests on promoter loans repayable on demand.

Key findings

  1. Consolidated profit is a subsidiary story, and the parent books a deferred tax asset against losses Major - Consolidated PAT was ₹8.08 crore versus ₹0.62 crore standalone, so 92% of profit sat at subsidiaries. The standalone books recognised a deferred tax asset of ₹2.69 crore as at 31 March 2026, up from ₹28.92 lakhs a year earlier, citing approved business projections despite losses in the current and prior year. The FY2021-22 through FY2023-24 statements did not recognise this asset, citing three straight years of losses.
  2. Audit opinions are unqualified, but the auditor repeatedly flags going-concern reliance on promoter support Major - The FY2025-26 standalone and consolidated opinions were unqualified. The FY2023-24 and FY2020-21 reports carried an Emphasis of Matter, a special call-out, stating accounts were prepared on a going-concern basis relying on continued promoter support, with no adjustment for its withdrawal. The FY2025-26 CARO report discloses cash losses of ₹1.16 crore in the current year and ₹3.3 crore the year before.
  3. Solvency rests on promoter-group loans repayable on demand, while pledged fixed deposits keep rising Major - Fixed deposits pledged against bank facilities stood at ₹6.9 crore as at 31 March 2026, up from ₹4.35 crore a year earlier and ₹3.6 crore in FY2024. Current liabilities include inter-corporate deposits from related parties repayable on demand, with the company not expecting immediate repayment based on past experience. The promoter group has committed in principle to continuous long-term support.
  4. Goodwill keeps rising while impairment testing has stopped Major - Consolidated goodwill increased in FY2024-25 and FY2025-26 due to foreign currency fluctuations and the Hamilton Research acquisition. No impairment testing was performed in FY2025-26, and no impairment loss was recognised. The accounting policy states goodwill is tested for impairment annually.
  5. Recurring interest-bearing loans and on-demand deposits flow between the company, its holding company, and subsidiaries Major - S&S Power Switchgear obtained loans from Hamilton & Company Limited at 10.5% interest, repayable after 15 years, during FY2025-26. The company extended non-interest bearing loans to two subsidiaries in FY2025-26. It also gave a corporate guarantee for a subsidiary's ICICI Bank working capital facility.
  6. Promoter control is absolute and board turnover is high, while ESOP grants concentrate value at prices far below market Major - Promoter shareholding was 74.97% with zero pledge. ESOP grants in February 2025 and March 2026 were made at an exercise price of ₹180.00 against grant-date share prices of ₹373.40 and ₹300.30. The vesting schedule was revised so employees can vest 33.33% of options after one year, versus the original three-year requirement.
  7. Recurring exchange penalties for listing-compliance failures Major - BSE and NSE each levied a ₹3,28,040 fine for non-compliance with Nomination and Remuneration Committee composition rules; the waiver was rejected and the fine paid in April 2026. Trading was temporarily suspended under the Graded Surveillance Measure, with a ₹30 lakh revocation fee payable in instalments. A penalty of ₹2,24,200 was paid for not appointing a qualified company secretary.
  8. Contingent liabilities are dominated by old disputes and an unquantified PF exposure Minor - An income tax demand of ₹92.98 lakhs for assessment year 2007-08 was dismissed by the High Court on monetary-limit grounds. The company has stated since FY2019-20 that it awaits clarity on the Supreme Court's PF judgment before updating its provision. A subsidiary received a GST demand of ₹50,24,525 for FY2020-21, against which an appeal has been filed.

What to watch

Bottom line: This is a disclosed and audited record with a clean opinion, but the substance is thin: profit is concentrated in subsidiaries, the parent books a deferred tax asset against a loss history, and solvency leans on promoter forbearance. The risk is structural, related-party, untested goodwill, and compliance lapses. Watch whether the deferred tax asset is realised, whether goodwill impairment testing resumes, and whether the on-demand deposits stay on demand.