Key Takeaways
- H1 soft, H2 bet: Consolidated H1 revenue reached only ~₹40 crore against the unchanged ₹100 crore FY26 target, so the second half must deliver roughly 1.5x the first half. Management is leaning on holiday-free quarters, returning French customers and a ramping ball plant.
- French subsidiary is the swing factor: Revenue collapsed from ~₹8 crore in Q1 to ~₹2 crore in Q2 on tariff uncertainty and European holidays, but old customers are returning with higher volumes for 2026 and the cost base has been reset through economic dismissals.
- Ball plant is built, not yet booked: Capacity stands ready at 200 tons per month but utilisation is only 40–50 tons, with the ramp-up gated by customer audits and sample approvals that have no firm completion date.
- Margins held firm in India, mix masked it: Standalone EBITDA margin printed at 40.9% ; consolidated gross margin moderation (78% to 66% YoY) reflects normal fluctuation and the dilutive French entity, not structural erosion.
- What to watch next quarter: Whether the ball plant lands its first material order from the large customer under evaluation, whether French revenue rebounds from the Q2 trough, and whether the delayed roller expansion stays on track for Q1 FY27 commissioning.
The H2 Bridge: How ₹100 Crore Stays Alive
Standalone revenue improved QoQ from ₹13.6 crore to ₹15 crore, and PAT jumped from ₹25.5 to ₹45.5, but the consolidated H1 base of ~₹40 crore leaves a steep climb. Management acknowledged the target is "not easy" and pointed to three levers: Indian and French holidays are now behind, order visibility is good, and bookings are strong.
- India operations running hot: The roller plant is at 90%+ utilisation and debottlenecking is complete, so incremental volume must come from the ball plant and the expanded roller capacity, neither of which is fully online yet.
- PM-KUSUM scheme has begun contributing a substantial portion of revenue, adding a policy-linked floor that was absent in prior years.
- Inventory is structural, not a warning: Working capital is higher because SKP develops its own engineered products rather than importing, a deliberate choice that supports sustainable margins. Management expects inventory to stay "more or less same."
Palshikar: "The target remains the same, but a practical approach will be if you do a 40 in first six months, we will do a much better in second half. That's what I can say."
French Subsidiary: Top-Line First, Margin Later
The French entity is the largest source of consolidated volatility. Revenue swung from ~₹8 crore in Q1 to ~₹2 crore in Q2, driven by global tariff uncertainty hitting European customers who supply the US, plus roughly four weeks of extended European holidays in July and August.
- Cost reset executed: Employee costs fell after economic dismissals under French law, bringing the entity to what management calls optimal staffing. The remaining cost structure is largely fixed and will reduce further through retirement and resource optimisation.
- Customer base rebuilding: The entity had shrunk from €16 million to €8 million pre-acquisition and declined further afterward, but old customers are now returning with higher volumes for 2026. Management's long-term target is to bring it back to the historical €16 million peak.
- France-India synergy emerging: SKP is positioning both facilities as a single global supplier, which it expects to bring more export volumes and new customers.
Palshikar: "Our focus for the French entity is very simple, top line. That's it. You achieve hit, hit, hit the new line, new targets, new customers, and we're constantly focused on this particular line."
Ball Plant: Capacity Ready, Demand Still in Validation
The ball plant is the largest call option in SKP's capacity story. Phase 1 capacity of 200 tons per month is fully installed, but current utilisation is only 40–50 tons per month. The gap to full utilisation depends entirely on customer approvals.
- Approval pipeline in progress: Sample submissions are done for some customers, and the audit and approval process is ongoing. One large customer, potentially taking 50% of total ball manufacturing capacity, is in evaluation, but its due diligence extends the timeline.
- Phase 2 has no clock: Management gave no timeline for the next 4,800 tons per annum phase, stating only that the "process is on" and dependent on customer approvals.
- Combined capacity ambition: From 125–130 tons two years ago to 400 tons in the next one to two years, spanning roller expansion and ball plant ramp-up.
Palshikar: "Currently, we maybe have operating around 40, 50 tons per month. So this is what is currently operating level, and we have to reach a 200 tons per month. This is the gap."
Roller Expansion: Delayed but Not Derailed
The roller plant is running near saturation at 90%+ utilisation, making the expansion from ~100 tons to 200 tons critical for near-term volume growth.
- Machinery supplier delays: Lead times of 8–9 months from machinery suppliers have pushed the commissioning target from year-end to Q1 of the next financial year.
- Space freed up: The boiler plant shift has cleared physical space, so the expansion is now a procurement and installation timeline issue, not a site-readiness one.
- Plant 3 (Zammar) commenced operations in March 2025 and utilisation has begun, adding incremental capacity ahead of the roller expansion.
Margins & Cost Structure
Standalone EBITDA margin printed at 40.9% in Q2, and PAT improved sharply QoQ. The consolidated picture is muddied by the French entity, where the cost structure is largely fixed and revenue is still rebuilding.
- Gross margin moderation explained: The drop from ~78% (H1 FY25) to ~66% (H1 FY26) is attributed to normal fluctuations, with the bottom line remaining in a consistent range.
- French employee costs down: Economic dismissals have reduced the subsidiary's cost base to optimal levels, and further reductions will come through retirement and resource optimisation.
- Stock-in-trade increase on the consolidated balance sheet reflects normal inventory fluctuations, not a build-up of slow-moving goods.
Competitive Positioning & Policy Tailwind
- Quality Control Order (QCO): When implemented, management expects it to be a boon for Indian manufacturers, with a 50% shift of the ₹10,000+ crore industry to domestic players benefiting companies of all sizes. No implementation timeline was discussed.
- Stance on competition: Management stated it is "not afraid of competition," including Chinese competition, and is focused on quality and delivery as its moat.
- Customer disclosure: Management declined to name large returning customers publicly but stated that big-name customers are coming back, building confidence.
Palshikar: "We are not afraid of the competition. That's number one. Even if it is a Chinese competition, we are not afraid."
Guidance & Commitments
| Commitment | Specifics | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| FY26 consolidated revenue | ₹100 crore target unchanged | FY26 full year |
| Roller capacity expansion | Doubling from ~100 tons to 200 tons | Q1 next financial year (delayed from year-end) |
| Ball plant utilisation | Ramp from 40–50 tons/month to 200 tons/month | Dependent on customer approvals; no date given |
| Combined capacity | Reach 400 tons (roller + ball) | Next one to two years |
| French entity revenue | Return to historical peak of €16 million | Long-term; no date given |
| French entity cost base | Further reduction through retirement and resource optimisation | Ongoing |
Key Metrics
| Metric | Q2 FY26 |
|---|---|
| Revenue from operations (standalone) | ₹15 crore, up from ₹13.6 crore in Q1 FY26 |
| EBITDA margin (standalone) | 40.9%, improved from Q1 FY26 |
| Profit after tax (standalone) | ₹45.5, up from ₹25.5 in Q1 FY26 |
| Consolidated EBITDA margin | 25.4% |
| H1 FY26 total revenue | ~₹40 crore |
| FY26 aspirational revenue target | ₹100 crore, management acknowledged it is not easy to achieve |
| French entity revenue | ~₹2 crore, down from ~₹8 crore in Q1 FY26 (per an analyst's math) |
| Roller plant utilisation | close to 90%+ |
| Ball plant utilisation | ~40–50 tons per month, against expanded capacity of 200 tons per month |
| Ball plant revenue share | ~7.5% to 8% of standalone revenue (H1 FY26) |
| Roller plant current operating level | ~90–100 tons per month, expanding to 200 tons per month |
| Combined capacity target (roller and ball) | 400 tons per month, in next one to two years, up from 125–130 tons two years back |
| French entity historical peak revenue | €16 million (in 2010), reduced to ~€8 million before SKP acquisition |
| H1 FY26 gross margin | ~66%, compared to ~78% in H1 FY25 (per an analyst's math) |