Shankar Lal Rampal Dye-Chem Ltd Forensic Report - SOIC x StockScans Report

as of Aug 2026

Shankar Lal Rampal Dye-Chem has an unbroken string of clean audit opinions, no subsidiaries, and a simple group structure. But the record carries a persistent gap between reported profit and cash, a police investigation notice received in August 2026, and a board of five promoter brothers. The company's own disclosures also show related-party transactions that are declared immaterial yet barely quantified, and independent director turnover in 2025 and 2026.

Key findings

  1. Operating cash flow has been negative against profit for nine years, while dividends continued Major - Cumulative operating cash flow over FY2017-18 to FY2025-26 was ₹-34 crore against cumulative profit of ₹87 crore, a CFO/PAT ratio of -0.39x. FY2026 CFO was ₹-7.05 crore against PAT of ₹13.49 crore, and FY2025 CFO was ₹-12.59 crore against PAT of ₹11.39 crore. The company still paid dividends, including ₹31.98 lakh for FY2023-24, described as "stable and similar to last year".
  2. Revenue growth is not converting to cash, with receivables absorbing the gap Major - Revenue grew from ₹288 crore in FY2024 to ₹402 crore in FY2025 and ₹465 crore in FY2026, while operating cash flow was ₹5.87 crore, then ₹-12.59 crore, then ₹-7.05 crore. Receivables days declined from 72.93 in FY2024 to 68.80 in FY2025, then rose to 79.92 in FY2026, and trade receivables were 54.45% of total assets as of FY2023-24. The FY2019-20 auditor flagged a Key Audit Matter on revenue recognition, citing the "risk that revenue is presented higher than actually generated".
  3. Company received a police investigation notice in August 2026 alleging false representation Major - On 7 Aug 2026, the company received a notice under Section 94 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from Police Station Gariahat, West Bengal, in connection with case no. 185 dated 01/08/2026 alleging false representation and wrongful loss to complainant Mr. Rajesh Kumar Biyani. A second notice the same day requires production of documents; the company denies the allegations and has not received a copy of the FIR. This follows the company's FY2025-26 statement that "no penalties or strictures" were imposed by regulators since listing in 2018.
  4. All five executive directors are brothers from the Inani family, holding 73.61% of the company Minor - The Chairman & Managing Director and all four Whole-Time Directors are brothers, a composition disclosed consistently from FY2020-21 through FY2025-26. Promoter holding is 73.61% with 0.00% pledge. Independent directors turn over: Mr. Aditya Soni ceased on 30 August 2025, Mr. Murli Atal resigned on 26 March 2026, and two new Independent Directors were appointed in August 2025 and April 2026.
  5. Company has no subsidiaries, joint ventures, or associates across all seven years reviewed Clean - The company consistently disclosed "no subsidiary, joint venture or associate company" in every annual report from FY2020-21 through FY2025-26. Consolidated and standalone PAT are identical at ₹18.44 crore for the latest FY, consistent with no consolidation of any subsidiary.

What to watch

Bottom line: This is a disclosed, audited record with a genuinely simple structure and a clean audit trail. The risk is concentrated in the gap between reported profit and cash, which has persisted for nine years while dividends continued, and in the family's control of both the board and the company's debt guarantees. The police notice is an event to track, not a conclusion. Read the receivables line and the related-party disclosures with that in mind, and watch the AGM on 19/09/2026 for the dividend and the director re-appointment.